Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

Top Menu

  • #Syria
  • #Palestine
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
  • Islamic Culture
  • Da’wah
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Youth
  • Confident Muslim
    • Difficult Questions
    • Alternative Civilisation
  • #Syria
  • #Palestine
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

logo

Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
    • 5 Things You Need to Know About Democracy

      December 7, 2019
      0
    • DEEP DIVE: Britain’s Rigged Politics

      December 3, 2019
      0
    • Democracy and Netflix

      December 3, 2019
      0
    • Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain: Our Message on the 2019 Election

      December 2, 2019
      0
    • The Idea of Democracy is Rotten and it’s Reality is Far Worse

      December 1, 2019
      0
    • Panel Discussion Elections 2019: It's time to question democracy

      November 27, 2019
      0
    • The Babri Masjid Verdict Reveals the True Face of India’s Democracy

      November 21, 2019
      0
    • In Representative Democracy The Common Folk Have No Real Voice

      November 15, 2019
      0
    • 8 Things You Need to Know About the Caliphate

      November 11, 2019
      0
  • Islamic Culture
    • Spirituality- Man’s Emotional Quest to Find God

      November 28, 2019
      0
    • Hajj - the Greatest Symbol of Unity

      August 10, 2019
      0
    • 7 Lessons from Al Isra wal Mi’raj

      April 3, 2019
      0
    • The meaning of Rizq (provision)

      March 8, 2019
      8
    • Islamic perspective on women

      March 7, 2019
      0
    • Miracle of the Quran

      Understanding the challenge of the Quran

      March 6, 2019
      0
    • Prophet Yusuf

      The story of Prophet Yusuf (as) – its purpose, relevance and significance

      July 25, 2018
      0
    • Tafseer: Surah Al-Qadr

      June 11, 2018
      0
    • Rajab: A Momentous History

      April 7, 2018
      0
  • Da’wah
    • Panel Discussion Elections 2019: It's time to question democracy

      November 27, 2019
      0
    • Khilafah: The Ummah's Shield - Mazhar Khan

      November 18, 2019
      0
    • Kashmir: The Dangerous US Plan - Adnan Khan

      November 15, 2019
      0
    • Video Highlights: Kashmir Conference 2019

      November 13, 2019
      0
    • The US Plan for South Asia

      November 2, 2019
      0
    • Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain Conference Clarifies the True Reality and Exposes Myths About ...

      October 28, 2019
      0
    • Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain Kashmir Conference 27 October 2019

      October 22, 2019
      0
    • EVENT: KASHMIR CONFERENCE 2019

      October 21, 2019
      0
    • Abrar Fahad’s Murder Exposes Hasina’s Treachery to Allow Indian Dominance of Bangladesh

      October 13, 2019
      0
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Youth
  • Confident Muslim
    • Difficult Questions
    • Alternative Civilisation
DemocracyPakistanViewpoint
Home›Viewpoint›Democracy›Dictatorship & Democracy: Two Sides of the Same Coin

Dictatorship & Democracy: Two Sides of the Same Coin

By Editor
July 14, 2018
1653
0
Share:

Some blindly speak of implementing democracy, with a religious zeal that would give any ‘extremist’ a run for their money, without considering its practical consequences. This is a problem for any country. Encouraged by Western sponsors, be they governments or Western think tanks, Pakistan and indeed the rest of the Muslim world is being constantly cajoled or harried towards adopting democracy. Yet, democracy has a consistent track record of utter failure in Pakistan.

Whilst many are forever complaining that democracy has never established itself in Pakistan or been given the chance to flourish, they fail to appreciate both the finer philosophical/ideological underpinnings of democracy and the practical, societal and political set up of Pakistan -which would reveal why democracy is doomed to fail.

Democracy is championed as the means of  progress – whilst the issue of Western nations supporting and doing business with dictators, tyrants and despots like Colonel Gaddafi of Libya, Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, Abdullah of Jordan, Pervez Musharraf, Islam Karimov of Uzbekistan and others, is brushed under the carpet. Pakistani political elites, being somewhat victims of an inferiority complex at Western technological advances, economic supremacy and cultural depth, rush to add their voices in agreement.

Pakistan is a country dominated by the super-rich industrialists, the feudal landowners and the army. These three interest groups have a stranglehold on the levers of power in Pakistan and often work together or against each other – as pragmatism would dictate – in order to maintain the status quo. Any idea that the common man can actually have a say through the ballot box in such conditions is naïve, at best. With many feudalists bringing with them a ‘chor bank’ instead of a vote bank, the industrialists being able to buy their way into power and the army able to just take power at the barrel of a gun, utilising the ballot box is an exercise in sheer futility.

Furthermore, the fact that the country finds itself in an economically stagnant condition, leaves it reliant upon external sources of finance which in turn make it politically dependant on foreign powers. This further entrenches the power of these three interest groups, as foreign powers such as America simply turn to the group that would best serve its agenda at any given time. Carrots are offered in terms of international recognition, being feted on the global scene, turning a blind eye to domestic corruption and offering financial ‘bailouts’ (read bribes) in exchange for implementing their agenda and strengthening their grip on the country.

Philosophically, democracy is promoted as a natural progression for mankind – including Muslims – as it is said to simply be a system where the people can have their say on who rules them and how. Democracy is said to be compatible with Islam, with some Muslims even citing the traditions of Shura in Islam as being democratic traditions, going so far as even saying that the Western world took democracy from Islam.

Yet, the essence of democracy is fundamentally opposed to Islam philosophically. At its core lies the concept that man shall rule over man by popular consent. Issues of how this is administratively carried out are secondary and do not change this core aspect of the system.

Whether this is the result of a parliamentary system or a presidential system, does not alter the fact that the collective or aggregate wisdom of the population is deemed appropriate to establish laws to regulate and govern society.

Laws are established to enforce the values of a society, and in a democracy, all laws are subject to change pending the will of the people. What is legal at one time may be illegal in another, and vice-versa. For example, in many countries in the Western world homosexuality, just a few decades ago was considered illegal, yet now is not only legal but a form of ‘marriage’ recognising gay couples is commonplace.

Islam is philosophically at loggerheads with such an approach to governing. At the core of Islam lies the concept of Tawheed, which establishes the worship of Allah (ﷻ) alone, having no other partners. The concept of worship includes not only engaging in acts of ritual spirituality, such as the five daily prayers or fasting during the month of Ramadhan, but to fundamentally hear and obey all the commands of Allah also. In the Quran, it is stated:

“…Do you then believe in a part of the Book and disbelieve in the other? What then is the reward of such among you as do this but disgrace in the life of this world, and on the day of resurrection they shall be sent back to the most grievous chastisement, and Allah is not at all heedless of what you do.” [Al-Baqarah : 85]

“It is not fitting for a Believer, man or woman, when a matter has been decided by Allah and His Messenger to have any option about their decision: if any one disobeys Allah and His Messenger, he is indeed on a clearly wrong Path.” [Al-Ahzab : 36]

“They have taken as lords besides Allah their rabbis and their monks and the Messiah son of Maryam, when they were bidden to worship only One Allah. There is no Allah save Him. Be He Glorified from all that they ascribe as partner (unto Him)!” [At-Taubah : 31]

“Once while Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) was reciting this verse (9:31), ‘Adi bin Hatim said, “O Allah’s Messenger! They do not worship them (i.e. the rabbis and monks).” Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) said: “They certainly do. They (i.e. the rabbis and monks) made lawful (halal) things as unlawful (haram) and unlawful things as lawful, and they (i.e. Jews and Christians) followed them; and by doing so, really worshipped them.” [Narrated in the books of Hadith by Ahmad, At-Tirmidhi and Ibn Jarir]

These citations from sources of Islamic law clearly state that the idea of following Islamic law in all spheres of life is inextricably linked to the concept of worship. To attempt to alter, dispute or reject any law set by Islam is tantamount to disbelief. Yet in a democracy the representative(s) of the people are empowered, on behalf of the people, to establish a set of laws of which none are sacrosanct, being forever subject to the ever-changing will of the people.

The rabbis and monks in a modern context, it would appear, are the MNAs, MPAs and Senators.

Even in periods of military dictatorship, including the General Zia era, ultimately the ability to legislate remains within the hands of man whilst paying lip service to Islam rather than matters  being deferred to the Quran and the Sunnah. A perfect example of this is the Zia era’s ‘Shariah Appellate Court’, which is subservient ultimately to the secular Supreme Court of Pakistan – which is based upon laws left behind by the British and made by Parliament.

It is clear that it is not just the superficial act of bowing one’s head towards a physical idol that is considered as having made partners with Allah, but also obeying anyone or group of people over and above the commands of Allah is also considered as having made an association with Him in worship. Thus democracy is a violation of the concept of Tawheed and is, therefore, shirk – the most severe sin in Islam.

Democracy is built upon the ideals of secularism, which removes the role of God from the state, promotes the idea of freedom – including the role of man to freely establish whatever laws he may wish. Democracy sets up man as a rival to God/Allah, by assigning him the role of Law Giver.

In Islam, the tradition of consultation (Shura) is well established, as it is mentioned in the Quran:

“…So pardon them and ask forgiveness for them and consult with them upon the conduct of affairs. Then, when you have taken a decision put your trust in Allah. For Allah loves those who put their trust (in Him).” [Aal-Imran : 159]

Some mistakenly equate this Quranic injunction recommending the ruler to consult the ruled, with the administrative side of democracy whereby Parliament/Congress/Senate debate matters amongst themselves. Hence, they believe that democracy is compatible with Islam and an ‘Islamic Democracy’ can exist. This confusion is reflected in some poll results where many in the Muslim world want democracy, yet at the same time a similar percentage (if not greater), want Shariah law and a Caliphate. It is only when both democracy and Islam are understood from a creedal level, that it becomes clear that the term ‘Islamic Democracy’ is a misnomer, as you cannot have two contradicting philosophical values such as Tawheed and secularism coexisting within one system.

Pakistan’s salvation lies in moving past this schism in the state.

Pakistan needs to decide whether it wishes to live and abide by Islam and in doing so adopt all of it, or whether it wishes to move away from this and attempt to become a fully-fledged secular liberal democracy and abandon Islam completely.

It cannot continue to sit on the fence, for this dithering between wanting to remain a spiritual Muslim in the personal sphere yet be secular in the public one is a malaise that is pulling the country apart. And for those who cannot decide, perhaps they should turn to the Quran for some political advice,

“And verily, if you ask them: ‘Who created the heavens and the earth?’ Surely, they will say: ‘Allah (has created them).’ Say: ‘Tell me then, the things that you invoke besides Allah, if Allah intended some harm for me, could they remove His harm, or if He (Allah) intended some mercy for me, could they withhold His Mercy?’ Say : ‘Sufficient for me is Allah; in Him those who trust (i.e. believers) must put their trust.’” [Az-Zumar : 38]

TagsCapitalismDemocracyKhilafahPakistanPakistan ElectionsShariahShura
Previous Article

What is ‘Real Change’?

Next Article

Can Pakistan Become a Superpower?

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +
  • 0

Related articles More from author

  • News Watch

    Lebanon’s Islamists view declaration of caliphate as heresy

    July 3, 2014
    By Editor
  • 3rd March 1924Viewpoint

    5 reasons why we MUST talk about Khilafah

    July 25, 2017
    By Abdul Wahid
  • PalestinePress Releases

    Liberating the whole of Palestine is the Islamic Solution for Al-Quds

    December 6, 2017
    By Yahya Nisbet
  • Press Releases

    Only the return of the Khilafah will silence those who attack Islam

    April 4, 2008
    By Editor
  • National Da'wahVideos

    Video Highlights: Kashmir Conference 2019

    November 13, 2019
    By Editor
  • Central Da'wahPakistan

    #FreeSisterRomana

    August 6, 2018
    By Editor

SoundCloud

Latest Video

DemocracyVideos

Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain: Our Message on the 2019 Election

Whether it’s the farce that is Brexit, or the growing problems faced by the common man in Britain, we can see clearly how democracy is very much about vying for ...
  • Khilafah: The Ummah’s Shield – Mazhar Khan

    By Editor
    November 18, 2019
  • Kashmir: The Dangerous US Plan – Adnan Khan

    By Editor
    November 15, 2019

Latest Articles

DemocracyViewpoint

5 Things You Need to Know About Democracy

With the UK general election taking place on 12th December following the Brexit fiasco, some Muslims are turning to the Labour Party to resist the onslaught of anti-Islamic sentiments that ...
  • DEEP DIVE: Britain’s Rigged Politics

    By Editor
    December 3, 2019
  • Democracy and Netflix

    By Editor
    December 3, 2019

Follow Us

  • 18384
    Followers
  • 23707
    Likes
  • 2740
    Subscribers