The ‘Crown Prince’ of Bahrain and Saudi ‘Royals’…Why not just invite Saif Gaddafi and Gamal Mubarak?!
Close links between UK government and ‘British made’ tyrants in Muslim lands
The guest list for the British Royal Wedding was unveiled this week.
It includes personal guests of the couple, as well as political guests of the State, since the wedding is that of a future head of state.
Two of the guests are the ‘Crown Prince’ of Bahrain and ‘Prince’ Mohamed bin Nawaf bin Abdulaziz of Saudi Arabia and ‘Princess’ Fadwa bint Khalid bin Abdullah bin Abdulrahman.
The shooting down of unarmed civilian protestors in Bahrain, part of the regional risings against the Middle East and North African regimes, has been followed by harsh repressive measures on opposition activists.
The Saudi regime, fearful for its own survival, intervened on the side of the Bahraini ‘Royal’ Family, sending in 1000 troops in March 2011.
These regimes, made in Britain, supported by Britain and America, are staunch allies… for now. The regimes who once provided stability – like the Gaddafi regime in Libya, Ali Abdullah Saleh’s in Yemen, and the Mubarak regime in Egypt – were once welcomed by the West – and have now been jettisoned. The West is actively looking for more credible long-term replacements in the region, with a democratic facade, who they can control.
But for now, for purely pragmatic reasons, they have maintain the protocols and formalities of old and decided to continue their embrace of members of these illegitimate regimes – whether Saudi, Bahraini, Kuwaiti or others.
For those who welcome the close relationship with these criminal regimes, our suggestion is don’t look at the ‘made in Britain’ stamp…look at the expiry date! You may get a shock.
Indeed why not indulge with buddies they shared aspects of worldly life fit for princes. Muslim monarchs delight themselves extending the honourable friendship to the enemies of Islam while the public go hungry with no security of jobs and often underpaid if not paid at all.
Muslims engaged in uprising against these tyrants are rightly demanding their ouster for their brutal rule has gone too far and wants Islamic teachings to be the source of laws. These pampered rulers slavishly clingling on the rope of the West for survival as they see the end is nigh.
If the British government abandons these ‘seasoned’ despots by withdarwing or revoking invitations for them to attend a high profile event, then they risk jeopardising much more than a long established Master-Slave relationship; particularly in the case of Saudi Arabia, which has the largest proven oil reserves.
The French government soon found its interests in Libya at great risk when it declared support for the Libyan uprising. The British, on the other hand, have ALWAYS LOOKED BOTH WAYS. In India, they criticised Pakistan – because it suited their interests at the time. But in Pakistan, they arrived bearing multi-million pound gifts for reforming education syllabus – because it suited their interests at the time. The Arab rulers have NEVER done anything to displease their Masters in the West, but if they were ditched like Ben Ali and Mubarak, they may well cut off vital oil supplies. Hence, the reality now is one of Mutually assured destruction for both MASTER and SLAVE.