Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

Top Menu

  • About US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
  • Islamic Culture
  • Da’wah
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
  • About US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

logo

Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
    • Abortion isn’t about Roe v Wade but Truth v Hypocrisy

      June 27, 2022
      0
    • Bangladesh Floods: farcical mantra of economic success disguising failure to provide basic ...

      June 24, 2022
      0
    • The Sectarian Card – Shia and Sunni divisions under the spotlight

      June 5, 2022
      0
    • Making Sense of Pakistan

      April 16, 2022
      0
    • How Should We View the War in Ukraine?

      March 30, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • DEEP DIVE: The Weaponisation and Politicisation of British Citizenship Laws

      March 12, 2022
      0
    • Our Role in the Ukraine war is to Expose the Propaganda

      March 2, 2022
      0
    • Muslims Should Rejoice Over the Islamic Ruling System

      January 21, 2022
      0
  • Islamic Culture
    • Reading Quran

      The story of the man who was told to “Enter Paradise” and ...

      January 24, 2022
      0
    • Significance of Rabi’ul-Awwal

      October 10, 2021
      0
    • Virtues of the Month of Muharram

      August 10, 2021
      0
    • The significance of first 10 days of Dhul Hijjah

      July 10, 2021
      0
    • The Honour of the Prophets

      April 30, 2021
      0
    • A to Z of Ramadan

      April 19, 2021
      0
    • The Dawah to Allah (swt)

      December 29, 2020
      0
    • Miracle of the Quran

      Q & A - Compilation of The Holy Quran During the Reign ...

      December 27, 2020
      0
    • Imam Bukhari: A Role Model for the ‘Ulema and Da’wah Carriers to ...

      November 17, 2020
      0
  • Da’wah
    • Call to action against Hindutva and Zionist aggression

      July 16, 2022
      0
    • National Conferences : From al-Hind to al-Quds: Speak Out | Act | ...

      June 18, 2022
      0
    • Public Demonstration - Independence Not Intervention

      April 22, 2022
      0
    • VIDEO : [LIVESTREAMED] Pakistan in Crisis: The Players, Politics, and People

      April 20, 2022
      0
    • Ramadan Message: The World Needs Islam - We Must Work for the ...

      April 1, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • Ramadhan event: Kyiv to Kabul: The World Needs Islam

      March 20, 2022
      0
    • Obituary of a Dawah Carrier Dr. Youssef Haj Youssef

      December 30, 2021
      0
    • Open Letter to Imams and Muslim Leaders

      September 28, 2021
      0
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
Comment
Home›Comment›Theresa May and the Cathy Mohan Debacle

Theresa May and the Cathy Mohan Debacle

By Editor
May 15, 2017
1219
0
Share:

News Comment

Theresa May was confronted by a voter today, Cathy Mohan in Oxfordshire who said she could not live on her remaining benefits of £100 a month after the replacement of the disability living allowance with the personal independence payment.

May said her government had “a lot of plans for people with mental health [problems] in particular” but the voter continued.

“…. I’ve got mild learning disabilities and I haven’t got a carer at the moment, and I’m angry. And I would like somebody to help me, because I can’t do everything I want to do”

May tried to interject but the voter continued: “Do you know what I want? I want my disability living allowance to come back. Not have PIPs and get nothing. I can’t live on £100 a month. They just took it all away from me.”

Disabled people number 13 million of the UK population, with 6.9 million of working age.

At the end of last year, the United Nations published a report which found evidence of systematic violations of Disabled people’s rights by the UK government due to welfare reform.

It is the first time a state has ever been investigated in this way and the UK is now the first state in the world of whom the UN has found reliable evidence of violations of Disabled people’s rights.

More than 10,000 disabled people have had their benefits slashed in just one month, after the government introduced a new, lower cap on the total benefits that any non-working household can receive.

The level of the benefit cap was cut from £26,000 to £20,000 (or £23,000 in Greater London) last November.

The cap is even lower – £13,400, and £15,410 in London – for single adults with no children.

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) admitted that it could be partly responsible for the deaths of some benefit claimants.

The admission came after its release of heavily-redacted versions of 49 secret “peer reviews” into benefit-related deaths, following the loss of a 21-month battle with Disability News Service (DNS) to keep them secret.

Some 2,380 people have died after being found fit for work and losing benefits. Also DWP figures have shown that between December 2011 and February 2014 the equivalent of about 90 people a month died after their Employment and Support Allowance claim was ended.

The 2,380 people who died had received Work Capability Assessments (WCA) to decide if they were eligible to receive ESA, which replaced incapacity benefit, income support and severe disablement allowance in 2008.

Of the 2,380, 1,340 died after appealing against their decisions, though it is not known what proportion of those appeals were successful or failed.

These are shocking statistics from a British Government that has trampled all over the dignity of vulnerable people.

The Government is in no position to lecture the world about human rights and dignity of people, when in its own country it does not care for the disabled. It has expected the physically and mentally disabled to work when they are unable. It has further expected those that have learning disabilities to complete assessments that mock their difficulties.

Deaths due to welfare reform are becoming increasingly common in the UK, where families are left rejected by a government that favours banks and corporate organisations, rather than the vulnerable and needy.

The British Government has practised the cruel art of Captalism perfectly on its own people- even the poor and disabled.

The Messenger of Allah (saw) said صلى الله عليه وسلم said

لَيْسَ لِابْنِ آدَمَ حَقٌّ فِي سِوَى هَذِهِ الْخِصَالِ: بَيْتٌ يَسْكُنُهُ وَثَوْبٌ يُوَارِي عَوْرَتَهُ وَجِلْفُ الْخُبْزِ وَالْمَاءِ

“The son of Adam has no right to anything except these properties: a house to live in, a clothing to cover his ‘awrah (parts of body that must be covered in public), a chunk of bread, and water” (reported by Al-Tirmidhi who said it is Hasan Sahih).


News Article: ‘I’m angry’: voter confronts Theresa May over disability benefit cuts

Theresa May’s belated attempts to engage directly with members of the public ran into difficulties when she was berated during a walkabout in Abingdon in Oxfordshire by a voter with a learning disability who has suffered from benefit cuts.

Cathy Mohan told the prime minister, who has been accused of hiding from the electorate, that she was forced to live on £100 a month in benefits after being denied help with the extra costs of coping with a learning disability.

“Do you know what I want? I want my disability living allowance to come back … I can’t live on £100 a month. They just took it all away from me,” Mohan said in a confrontation that was captured on camera.

It occurred after May’s campaign shifted strategy to allow more contact with voters. Her team changed tack after becoming acutely sensitive to claims the prime minister was avoiding ordinary people by holding invitation-only events for Conservative party activists and employees in their workplaces.

May tried to defend her record, saying that the government had “a lot of plans for people with mental health [problems] in particular” but Mohan continued to challenge her, reminding her that people with learning disabilities needed more help, too.

“I’ve got mild learning disabilities and I haven’t got a carer at the moment and I’m angry. And I would like somebody to help me, because I can’t do everything I want to do,” Mohan said.

“I’m talking about everybody, not just me. I’m talking about everybody who’s got mental health and learning disabilities. I want them not to have their money taken away from them and being crippled. The fat cats keep all the money and us lot get nothing.”

May tried to interject but the voter continued to question her over the highly controversial switch from the disability living allowance (DLA) to personal independence payment (PIP) under the Conservatives.

Under these changes, disability living allowance, which provided for the extra cost of coping with a disability, is being replaced by PIP. The criteria for receiving it have been tightened, leading to more than 160,000 vulnerable people being denied additional financial help they once received.

Afterwards, charities including Mencap said it was worrying that May seemed “unclear on the difference between a learning disability and mental health”.

The confrontation prompted a stream of questions about disability benefits when May answered voters on ITV’s Facebook live page, hosted by political editor Robert Peston.

May told Peston that disability benefit reforms were “part of trying to ensure that we focus payments on those who most need it, those who are most vulnerable”.

She added: “There are a number of issue people raise around PIPs. One is about the assessment process and we have been making changes in that to make that a better process for people. We want to try to help those disabled people able to get into the workplace to do so.”

The prime minister was also ambushed by a question from the Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, who wrote in to ask why she was refusing to take part in television debates head-to-head with him.

“What I think is more important is actually that I and he take questions directly from the voters. I don’t think people get much out of seeing politicians having a go at each other; I think people want to hear directly,” she said.

ITV will host a live election debate in Salford on Thursday and has said that an invitation to the leaders of the seven biggest parties will remain open. However, May is refusing to attend and Corbyn will not participate if she does not turn up.

May’s tightly controlled campaign is being run by her co-chiefs of staff, Nick Timothy and Fiona Hill, advised by the Australian election strategist Lynton Crosby. The party is understood to be planning to publish its manifesto on Thursday, although there has been no official confirmation of the date.

The prime minister has agreed to take part in a televised interview in which she will be questioned by Jeremy Paxman and a studio audience on a programme jointly aired by Channel 4 and Sky, with Corbyn appearing on the same show either immediately before or after.

Earlier on Monday, May unveiled a new policy that would require companies to publish details of the gap between pay levels for staff of different ethnic backgrounds – and extension of proposed new rules on gender pay gap reporting.

It comes after Trades Union Congress (TUC) research found ethnic minority workers educated to A-level earned 17% less than white colleagues, while the salaries of those with degrees are 10% lower. The disparity was even greater for black university graduates, who earn 23% less than their white counterparts, while black people with A-levels were paid 14% less.

It forms part of what the Conservatives claim will be a “new deal for workers” promising the greatest ever expansion of rights and protections – claims dismissed by Labour as nonsense.

May said: “The fact that different ethnic groups are being paid less for doing the same jobs is an injustice which cannot be allowed in 21st-century Britain. My plan will deliver a fairer deal for all workers, by extending rights and protections, guaranteeing rises in the national living wage and delivering a strong and stable economy. There is only one leader at this election who will put rights and opportunities for ordinary working families first.”

Guardian

Previous Article

50% of Britain Atheist – struggling with ...

Next Article

Trump Visits Saudi to bless their treacherous ...

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +

National Conferences

Join US on Telegram

Podcast

Latest Posts

Press Releases

The Champions of Free Speech Haven’t a Leg to Stand on

Despite all Muslims being the victims of hate speech against the Prophet ﷺ and His companions (May Allah be pleased with all of them), the ardent secularists in the British ...
  • From Al-Hind to Al-Quds – Establish the Khilafah – End the Oppression

    By Yahya Nisbet
    July 17, 2022
  • Call to action against Hindutva and Zionist aggression

    By Editor
    July 16, 2022
  • From Al-Hind to Al-Quds Conference – Speak Out – Act – Liberate

    By Yahya Nisbet
    July 14, 2022
  • Abortion isn’t about Roe v Wade but Truth v Hypocrisy

    By Taji Mustafa
    June 27, 2022
  • Bangladesh Floods: farcical mantra of economic success disguising failure to provide basic protection

    By Editor
    June 24, 2022
  • National Conferences : From al-Hind to al-Quds: Speak Out | Act | Liberate

    By Editor
    June 18, 2022
  • Two July Conferences on Indian and Zionist Oppression Organised by Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

    By Yahya Nisbet
    June 10, 2022
  • Press Centre