Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

Top Menu

  • About US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
  • Islamic Culture
  • Da’wah
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
  • About US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

logo

Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
    • Abortion isn’t about Roe v Wade but Truth v Hypocrisy

      June 27, 2022
      0
    • Bangladesh Floods: farcical mantra of economic success disguising failure to provide basic ...

      June 24, 2022
      0
    • The Sectarian Card – Shia and Sunni divisions under the spotlight

      June 5, 2022
      0
    • Making Sense of Pakistan

      April 16, 2022
      0
    • How Should We View the War in Ukraine?

      March 30, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • DEEP DIVE: The Weaponisation and Politicisation of British Citizenship Laws

      March 12, 2022
      0
    • Our Role in the Ukraine war is to Expose the Propaganda

      March 2, 2022
      0
    • Muslims Should Rejoice Over the Islamic Ruling System

      January 21, 2022
      0
  • Islamic Culture
    • Reading Quran

      The story of the man who was told to “Enter Paradise” and ...

      January 24, 2022
      0
    • Significance of Rabi’ul-Awwal

      October 10, 2021
      0
    • Virtues of the Month of Muharram

      August 10, 2021
      0
    • The significance of first 10 days of Dhul Hijjah

      July 10, 2021
      0
    • The Honour of the Prophets

      April 30, 2021
      0
    • A to Z of Ramadan

      April 19, 2021
      0
    • The Dawah to Allah (swt)

      December 29, 2020
      0
    • Miracle of the Quran

      Q & A - Compilation of The Holy Quran During the Reign ...

      December 27, 2020
      0
    • Imam Bukhari: A Role Model for the ‘Ulema and Da’wah Carriers to ...

      November 17, 2020
      0
  • Da’wah
    • Call to action against Hindutva and Zionist aggression

      July 16, 2022
      0
    • National Conferences : From al-Hind to al-Quds: Speak Out | Act | ...

      June 18, 2022
      0
    • Public Demonstration - Independence Not Intervention

      April 22, 2022
      0
    • VIDEO : [LIVESTREAMED] Pakistan in Crisis: The Players, Politics, and People

      April 20, 2022
      0
    • Ramadan Message: The World Needs Islam - We Must Work for the ...

      April 1, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • Ramadhan event: Kyiv to Kabul: The World Needs Islam

      March 20, 2022
      0
    • Obituary of a Dawah Carrier Dr. Youssef Haj Youssef

      December 30, 2021
      0
    • Open Letter to Imams and Muslim Leaders

      September 28, 2021
      0
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
Press Releases
Home›Media›Press Releases›Iran, Proliferation and the National Intelligence Estimate

Iran, Proliferation and the National Intelligence Estimate

By Editor
December 16, 2007
1227
0
Share:

The recent publication of the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) by sixteen American intelligence agencies has caused shockwaves in Washington and foreign capitals across the globe.


The conclusion by the NIE that they have strong confidence that Iran stopped its nuclear programme in the autumn of 2003, on the surface seems to undercut the Bush administration’s policy from its knees. However as with most things, looks can be deceptive and first impressions inaccurate. Far from undercutting US policy, the NIE assessment provides the necessary cover for a new phase of US Iranian relations, one that moves the relationship from the covert shadows and into the open. Indeed, the NIE raises several issues around US-Iranian relation, nuclear proliferation and the nature of intelligence that have still not been covered adequately in the western media.

 

Firstly, there is a myth that US-Iranian relations have been at best horrendous and at worst two steps away from an armed conflict. Yet this is an inaccurate portrayal, notwithstanding the colourful rhetoric that emanates periodically from both sides. Whether it was the Iran-Contra arms deals of the 1980’s, the Iranian support for the war in Afghanistan, Iran’s assistance in removing Saddam Hussein or the recent Iranian help in dampening the violence down in Baghdad, Iran and the US have in actuality been on the same side in many recent conflicts. Indeed, far from Iran playing a destabilising role in the Middle East, the US continues to be able to leverage Iran to keep other states in check while also allowing it to justify its huge military presence in the region. The Iranian reaction to the NIE was also revealing, instead of reacting with caution and thus avoiding the trap of a different conclusion emerging from any NIE in the future, Iranians have gleefully embraced the assessment and called for a new rapprochement with Washington. President Ahmadinejad called the document "a positive step forward" and was quoted by the Fars news agency as saying "If one or two other steps are taken, the conditions will be ripe and will lose their complexities and the way will be open for interactions between the two sides." He also said the following "The main body of the problem has been resolved. There are no ambiguities and the ground has been set for cooperation on different issues."

 

Secondly, the NIE has been presented as an attempt by the intelligence community to regain their credibility after the Iraq WMD fiasco where intelligence was compromised to fit with political objectives. On both sides of the Atlantic intelligence agencies were not just wrong about what was going on in Baghdad in 2003, but were consistently wrong in the years leading up to the war. Indeed, the NIE itself in its publication in 2005 stated that Iran possessed a nuclear weapons programme, which assuming the 2007 NIE is now correct, means that the 2005 NIE’s key conclusion was pure fiction. The conclusions of the 2007 NIE, though a shock to many who were expecting a US strike on Iran, are consistent with the views of the Pentagon who are hostile to any attack as evidenced by leaks in recent weeks, the State Department and even the White House. Indeed, it was President Bush that appointed Robert Gates as US defence secretary knowing that he had written articles in the past advocating a rapprochement with Iran and that he was then serving on the Baker-Hamilton commission who were advocating more direct diplomacy with Iran. Yet despite the fact that intelligence assessments can never be exact and are more of an art rather than a science, they are still viewed as hallowed by many and are frequently used to justify a pre-arranged policy. This makes them very susceptible to being politicised by an establishment who despite the debacle of the Iraq war remain eager to mislead their publics when they believe this becomes necessary.

 

The last thing the NIE brings to the fore is the continuing hypocrisy that surrounds nuclear non-proliferation. Since the publication of the NIE, politicians on both sides of the Atlantic have warned about the dangers of complacency, with British Foreign Secretary David Milliband being especially vociferous in an article in the Financial Times shortly after. Of course in Britain and America’s ideal world the only countries that should have nuclear weapons are themselves. Yet in an ideal world, the US would spend $600 billion on providing adequate health care and social security to its own citizens or alleviating endemic poverty in the third world, rather than spending it on weapon systems and smart bombs. What is galling is to take lessons on nuclear non-proliferation from a country such as the United States that is the only country in history to have dropped two atomic bombs on a civilian population or the United Kingdom who while lecturing the world on nuclear non-proliferation is spending tens of billions on upgrading its own Trident nuclear based submarines. Of course, the US and the UK will act in their national interest, yet then why deny that to the Muslim world? The biggest threat to the peoples of Cairo, Damascus and Amman are not bombs from Tehran but those that emanate from Washington, London and Tel Aviv.

 

What is becoming increasingly clear is that the Muslim world lacks a coherent presence in the international arena to address issues such as those that emanate from the NIE. By remaining divided and split into 50 plus states, it becomes easier for outside powers to manipulate the situation and undermine our security, just look at Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestine. What Muslims need to do is remove their current leaderships, unify their resources and implement the Islamic Khilafah (Caliphate) system. Only then can the Muslim world adequately confront all the challenges of the 21st century and compete effectively with the leading nations of the world.

 

Sajjad Khan


Political advisor to the UK Executive Committee

Hizb ut Tahrir Britain

16 December 2007/ 7 Dhul Hijjah 1428

Previous Article

Britain’s withdrawal from Basra

Next Article

Britain’s withdrawal from Basra

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +

National Conferences

Join US on Telegram

Podcast

Latest Posts

Press Releases

The Champions of Free Speech Haven’t a Leg to Stand on

Despite all Muslims being the victims of hate speech against the Prophet ﷺ and His companions (May Allah be pleased with all of them), the ardent secularists in the British ...
  • From Al-Hind to Al-Quds – Establish the Khilafah – End the Oppression

    By Yahya Nisbet
    July 17, 2022
  • Call to action against Hindutva and Zionist aggression

    By Editor
    July 16, 2022
  • From Al-Hind to Al-Quds Conference – Speak Out – Act – Liberate

    By Yahya Nisbet
    July 14, 2022
  • Abortion isn’t about Roe v Wade but Truth v Hypocrisy

    By Taji Mustafa
    June 27, 2022
  • Bangladesh Floods: farcical mantra of economic success disguising failure to provide basic protection

    By Editor
    June 24, 2022
  • National Conferences : From al-Hind to al-Quds: Speak Out | Act | Liberate

    By Editor
    June 18, 2022
  • Two July Conferences on Indian and Zionist Oppression Organised by Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

    By Yahya Nisbet
    June 10, 2022
  • Press Centre