Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

Top Menu

  • About US
  • Join US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
  • Islamic Culture
  • Da’wah
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
  • About US
  • Join US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

logo

Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
    • Abortion isn’t about Roe v Wade but Truth v Hypocrisy

      June 27, 2022
      0
    • Bangladesh Floods: farcical mantra of economic success disguising failure to provide basic ...

      June 24, 2022
      0
    • The Sectarian Card – Shia and Sunni divisions under the spotlight

      June 5, 2022
      0
    • Making Sense of Pakistan

      April 16, 2022
      0
    • How Should We View the War in Ukraine?

      March 30, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • DEEP DIVE: The Weaponisation and Politicisation of British Citizenship Laws

      March 12, 2022
      0
    • Our Role in the Ukraine war is to Expose the Propaganda

      March 2, 2022
      0
    • Muslims Should Rejoice Over the Islamic Ruling System

      January 21, 2022
      0
  • Islamic Culture
    • Reading Quran

      The story of the man who was told to “Enter Paradise” and ...

      January 24, 2022
      0
    • Significance of Rabi’ul-Awwal

      October 10, 2021
      0
    • Virtues of the Month of Muharram

      August 10, 2021
      0
    • The significance of first 10 days of Dhul Hijjah

      July 10, 2021
      0
    • The Honour of the Prophets

      April 30, 2021
      0
    • A to Z of Ramadan

      April 19, 2021
      0
    • The Dawah to Allah (swt)

      December 29, 2020
      0
    • Miracle of the Quran

      Q & A - Compilation of The Holy Quran During the Reign ...

      December 27, 2020
      0
    • Imam Bukhari: A Role Model for the ‘Ulema and Da’wah Carriers to ...

      November 17, 2020
      0
  • Da’wah
    • National Conferences : From al-Hind to al-Quds: Speak Out | Act | ...

      June 18, 2022
      0
    • Public Demonstration - Independence Not Intervention

      April 22, 2022
      0
    • VIDEO : [LIVESTREAMED] Pakistan in Crisis: The Players, Politics, and People

      April 20, 2022
      0
    • Ramadan Message: The World Needs Islam - We Must Work for the ...

      April 1, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • Ramadhan event: Kyiv to Kabul: The World Needs Islam

      March 20, 2022
      0
    • Obituary of a Dawah Carrier Dr. Youssef Haj Youssef

      December 30, 2021
      0
    • Open Letter to Imams and Muslim Leaders

      September 28, 2021
      0
    • Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain Sends Delegation to Chinese Embassy Condemning the Inhumane Treatment ...

      June 30, 2021
      0
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
Press Releases
Home›Media›Press Releases›Letter challenging Philip Hollobone MP to debate on his calls for UK burqa ban

Letter challenging Philip Hollobone MP to debate on his calls for UK burqa ban

By Press Editor
July 27, 2010
1047
0
Share:

Philip Hollobone MP
House of Commons
London
SW1A 0AA

26 July 2010

Re: Your Calls for a Burqa Ban in the UK

Dear Mr Hollobone,

I write to you as a Muslim woman and representative from Hizb ut-Tahrir, an Islamic political party. I do not wear the niqaab or burqa but I know many respected Muslim women that do wear it as a sincere form of religious devotion.

I would value the opportunity to engage in a public discussion or debate with you on the matter of the oppression of women – something that is frequently raised as part of the ‘niqab’ debate. I would like to do this for three main reasons:

Firstly, I believe that far from Islam generally or the niqaab specifically subjugating women, as many claim, it is in fact Western capitalist liberal values that are a major cause of the oppression of women globally. The objectification of women’s bodies in the advertising, entertainment, and pornography industries all under the premise of freedom of expression and driven by the pursuit of profit within capitalist societies has dehumanized, devalued, and degraded women. Women have been condemned to commodities to satisfy the desires of men, their respect bought up by the free market, and exploitation of their beauty normalized, to the extent that frequenting lap dancing clubs is now an acceptable corporate method by which to entertain clients. So routine is this style of degrading women that delegates at the 2008 Conservative Party conference were offered discount tickets to a lap-dancing club. The constant bombardment of young girls with images of what constitutes beauty has led to many viewing their faces and bodies as the passport to success rather than their minds and skills. It has led to society evaluating the worth of women according to the extent of their attractiveness to men. It is all this that is regressive as regards to the advancement of women within society, not modes of religious dress worn as expressions of modesty.

In contrast to this, Islam views the woman’s dignity as sacrosanct and has prohibited exploitation of her looks and her objectification within society. The Islamic dress code is one means by which to ensure that society values women according to their thinking, abilities, and behaviour rather than their physical appearance.

Secondly, for all the accusations that veiled women cut themselves off from normal human interaction and engagement in society, in reality it is insults and prejudice against their dress, alongside hijab and niqab bans that seclude women from public life and make them social outcasts. In light of your derogatory comments that the face veil is a symbol of separation and fear – statements that increase the discrimination Muslim women face in society – one wonders who is fuelling disengagement. Furthermore, it is not without irony that various ‘male dominated’ European parliaments, who have described the burqa as a symbol of the subjugation of women by men, see it fit to exert their male patriarchy to dictate to women how they should and should not dress.

Thirdly, I believe this debate simultaneously exploits and fuels an increasingly hostile climate to Muslims in Europe for cheap political ends. It has provided a veneer of acceptability for racist expression and anti-immigrant rants. Europe’s politicians rarely address any aspect of clothing or personal attire. The media usually confine coverage of women’s clothing to their fashion pages. Yet somehow many Western politicians and media outlets have decided that Muslim women’s dress tops the political agenda, even trumping the disastrous Afghanistan occupation and the economic crisis which is far from over. Many have questioned why Western politicians and media in the midst of one of the worst economic crises in living memory would wish to focus national attention and expend valuable legislative time and energies on a garment worn by a few hundred women (if that) within their societies – other than perhaps to curry favour amongst the far right sectors of their communities. It has been the bigotry that has characterised this obsession with the veil and the antagonism of proposed bans of religious dress codes that has stoked tensions, fuelled prejudice, and divided communities – not women’s clothing.

This call for a niqaab ban exposes the intolerance in Western secular societies, leaving talk of freedom, tolerance and pluralism with the appearance of being little more than a smokescreen behind which lie racism, intolerance and bigotry.

I hope you will seriously consider my offer of a public debate, as I can assure you that although the veil has been labelled a ‘symbol of oppression’, calls for banning women from wearing Islamic dress is clearly a ‘symbol of failure’ to convince Muslim women intellectually to adopt Western liberal values. It has all the appearance of imposing your views through state force rather than force of argument, having lost the debate.

Yours sincerely,

Dr Nazreen Nawaz

Women’s Media Representative
Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

TagsBurqaNiqab
Previous Article

This week, the ‘Islamism-conveyor belt’ theories of ...

Next Article

HT’s Dr Nazreen challenges Philip Hollobone MP, ...

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +

National Conferences

Join US on Telegram

Podcast

Latest Posts

Viewpoint

Abortion isn’t about Roe v Wade but Truth v Hypocrisy

he recent US Supreme Court verdict reversing Roe v Wade dominated the front pages of every Western media outlet. Abortion has become so toxic that even the worst cost of living crisis ...
  • Bangladesh Floods: farcical mantra of economic success disguising failure to provide basic protection

    By Editor
    June 24, 2022
  • National Conferences : From al-Hind to al-Quds: Speak Out | Act | Liberate

    By Editor
    June 18, 2022
  • The Champions of Free Speech Haven’t a Leg to Stand on

    By Yahya Nisbet
    June 13, 2022
  • Two July Conferences on Indian and Zionist Oppression Organised by Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

    By Yahya Nisbet
    June 10, 2022
  • The Sectarian Card – Shia and Sunni divisions under the spotlight

    By Editor
    June 5, 2022
  • Muslims Must Condemn the Hate Filled Film and the Attempt to Divide Us

    By Yahya Nisbet
    June 5, 2022
  • Protest in London Says No To More Democracy, Yes to the Khilafah

    By Yahya Nisbet
    May 7, 2022
  • Press Centre