Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

Top Menu

  • About US
  • Join US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
  • Islamic Culture
  • Da’wah
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
  • About US
  • Join US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

logo

Header Banner

Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
    • Making Sense of Pakistan

      April 16, 2022
      0
    • How Should We View the War in Ukraine?

      March 30, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • DEEP DIVE: The Weaponisation and Politicisation of British Citizenship Laws

      March 12, 2022
      0
    • Our Role in the Ukraine war is to Expose the Propaganda

      March 2, 2022
      0
    • Muslims Should Rejoice Over the Islamic Ruling System

      January 21, 2022
      0
    • Another Warmonger Honoured for Serving the British Elite

      January 2, 2022
      0
    • The Golden Jubilee of Bangladesh Victory Day (Bijoy Dibos): a cause for ...

      December 13, 2021
      0
    • Playing Politics with the Uygher Muslims

      December 2, 2021
      0
  • Islamic Culture
    • Reading Quran

      The story of the man who was told to “Enter Paradise” and ...

      January 24, 2022
      0
    • Significance of Rabi’ul-Awwal

      October 10, 2021
      0
    • Virtues of the Month of Muharram

      August 10, 2021
      0
    • The significance of first 10 days of Dhul Hijjah

      July 10, 2021
      0
    • The Honour of the Prophets

      April 30, 2021
      0
    • A to Z of Ramadan

      April 19, 2021
      0
    • The Dawah to Allah (swt)

      December 29, 2020
      0
    • Miracle of the Quran

      Q & A - Compilation of The Holy Quran During the Reign ...

      December 27, 2020
      0
    • Imam Bukhari: A Role Model for the ‘Ulema and Da’wah Carriers to ...

      November 17, 2020
      0
  • Da’wah
    • Public Demonstration - Independence Not Intervention

      April 22, 2022
      0
    • VIDEO : [LIVESTREAMED] Pakistan in Crisis: The Players, Politics, and People

      April 20, 2022
      0
    • Ramadan Message: The World Needs Islam - We Must Work for the ...

      April 1, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • Ramadhan event: Kyiv to Kabul: The World Needs Islam

      March 20, 2022
      0
    • Obituary of a Dawah Carrier Dr. Youssef Haj Youssef

      December 30, 2021
      0
    • Open Letter to Imams and Muslim Leaders

      September 28, 2021
      0
    • Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain Sends Delegation to Chinese Embassy Condemning the Inhumane Treatment ...

      June 30, 2021
      0
    • Jahangir Raja: Obituary of a Da’wah Carrier

      June 28, 2021
      0
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
News Watch
Home›News Watch›Is it justice to lock up Babar Ahmad for so long without trial?

Is it justice to lock up Babar Ahmad for so long without trial?

By Press Editor
November 7, 2011
777
0
Share:

Babar Ahmad has spent seven years behind bars fighting a US extradition warrant. Innocent or not, he deserves a fair hearing here

On 2 December 2003, in the middle of the night, anti-terror officers from the Metropolitan police’s notorious territorial support group burst into the home of a computer programmer named Babar Ahmad in Tooting, south London. Ahmad was punched, kicked and strangled. He arrived at Paddington police station with 73 injuries to his body. Yet, just six days later, he was released without charge (and subsequently offered £60,000 compensation by the Met, which conceded that he had been the victim of a “serious, gratuitous and prolonged attack”).

However, Ahmad’s “ordeal” – to quote Judge Geoffrey Rivlin QC at a recent hearing – wasn’t over. It was only the beginning of his Orwellian nightmare. Nine months later, on 5 August 2004, Ahmad was rearrested by officers from Scotland Yard acting on a US extradition warrant. The Americans accused him of running a website to raise funds for Islamist terrorists and providing material support to the Taliban, the Chechen mujahideen and al-Qaida.

For seven long years, Ahmad has languished behind bars, fighting against his extradition – under the Labour government’s “lopsided” (Nick Clegg) and “rotten” (Shami Chakrabarti) Extradition Act 2003, which allows for British citizens to be removed from the UK without the need for a court to hear if there is any actual evidence against them – and appealing to the European court of human rights to block the move. He is believed to be the longest detained British citizen – held without conviction or even charge as a “category A”, high-security prisoner for 88 months.

But might this be about to change? In June, a report by parliament’s joint committee on human rights concluded that a “most appropriate forum” safeguard should be implemented, which would allow a British judge “to refuse extradition where the alleged offence took place wholly or largely in the UK”, and called for a “requirement for the requesting country to show a prima facie case”.

Then, this month, the “Put Babar Ahmad on trial in the UK” e-petition, secured its 100,000th signature, thereby crossing the mark required to trigger a parliamentary debate. Backed by a handful of celebrities, including comedian Mark Thomas and boxer Amir Khan, and a few dozen British mosques, the Ahmad e-petition is one of only five so far to have attracted more than 100,000 signatures (but little press coverage).

So will MPs, especially those Conservatives who have been so exercised by our perceived loss of sovereignty to the European Union, now use this opportunity to denounce the very real loss of sovereignty to the US on the issue of extradition and champion the cause of a British citizen on the floor of the Commons? I am told that the Tory leader of the Commons, Sir George Young, is planning to advise members of the backbench business committee, which schedules debates on e-petitions, to ignore the Ahmad one on the grounds that it is “sub judice”. In law, sub judice – Latin for “under judgment” – refers to a case currently under trial. Yet the whole point of this particular e-petition is to highlight the fact that Ahmad has been denied and deprived of a trial in his own country, and that he has been in legal limbo for more than seven years.

The whole episode smells of a miscarriage of justice. If Ahmad is a terrorist, or linked to terrorists, why has our own Crown Prosecution Service repeatedly refused to try him? Why did the British authorities choose to free him without charge after his first arrest in December 2003, despite having a panoply of anti-terror laws at their disposal? Could it be that the “evidence” against him is nonexistent? For instance, the US justice department extradition request in 2004 drew attention to a faded, four-page tourist brochure of the Empire State Building found in Ahmad’s home by TSG officers. In fact, the brochure was picked up by Ahmad’s father on a visit to New York in … 1973. (That didn’t, however, prevent unnamed “federal officials” from using it to brief the New York Daily News in October 2004 that “Al-Qaida thugs … may have considered taking down the Empire State Building”.)

Let me be clear: I don’t know Ahmad. I’ve never met him or spoken to him. Friends of his tell me he is a “good guy” and that he “isn’t a [religious] headbanger”. They remind me that his friend and cousin Sarah Ali was one of the 67 Britons killed by al-Qaida in the 9/11 attacks. His local MP, the shadow justice secretary, Sadiq Khan, has said he is “known locally in Tooting as a caring and helpful member of our community”.

Ahmad may or may not be guilty of terror-related offences. But that isn’t the point. What matters is that the only tried and trusted method we have of establishing guilt is a trial in open court – not unsourced and unproven US allegations behind the scenes.

Our former prime minister Gordon Brown once infamously called for “British jobs for British workers”. It is time for his successor, David Cameron – who attacked the one-sided Extradition Act in opposition, and whose coalition agreement with the Liberal Democrats calls for an “evenhanded” extradition process – to demand British trials for British citizens. Ahmad, like every other citizen, has a right to see the evidence against him; he has a right to a fair trial, in his own country, in front of a jury of his peers. Anything else would be a travesty of British justice.

Mehdi Hasan

Guardian

Previous Article

Cricket’s corruption is symptomatic of a failed ...

Next Article

75,000 women converts to Islam in last ...

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +
  • 0

Related articles More from author

  • News Watch

    David Cameron to target Islamists who hold ‘un-British’ beliefs

    June 6, 2011
    By Press Editor
  • News Watch

    2010: Over 600 died in 118 drone strikes

    January 1, 2011
    By Editor
  • News Watch

    Read the Script: Babar Ahmad & Co. Verdict

    October 5, 2012
    By Press Editor
  • News Watch

    Turkey seeks reconciliation with Israel

    December 26, 2010
    By Editor
  • News Watch

    US won’t stand “slackness” by Pak Army in “war on terror”: Holbrooke

    September 18, 2010
    By Editor
  • News Watch

    US uses rumours of chemical weapons to underpin threat of action in Syria

    December 9, 2012
    By Press Editor

Leave a reply Cancel reply

Liberate Al Aqsa

Join US on Telegram

Podcast

Latest Posts

Press Releases

Protest in London Says No To More Democracy, Yes to the Khilafah

Members of Hizb ut Tahrir in Britain, alongside supporters from the Muslim community, gathered on Saturday 7th May 2022 at the Pakistan High Commission in London to protest against US ...
  • Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain to Protest American Interference in Pakistan’s Politics

    By Yahya Nisbet
    May 1, 2022
  • Public Demonstration – Independence Not Intervention

    By Editor
    April 22, 2022
  • VIDEO : [LIVESTREAMED] Pakistan in Crisis: The Players, Politics, and People

    By Editor
    April 20, 2022
  • The Geopolitics of Badr

    By Editor
    April 17, 2022
  • Making Sense of Pakistan

    By Editor
    April 16, 2022
  • Muslims in Britain Should Speak Out Against the Pakistani Leadership’s Surrender of Kashmir

    By Yahya Nisbet
    April 15, 2022
  • Muslims in Britain should support the call for the Khilafah in Pakistan

    By Yahya Nisbet
    April 12, 2022
  • Press Centre