Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

Top Menu

  • About US
  • Join US
  • Books
  • Videos
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
  • Islamic Culture
  • Da’wah
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Palestine
  • Hindutva
  • About US
  • Join US
  • Books
  • Videos
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer

logo

Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
    • When Democracy Favours the Capitalists over the Poor

      November 22, 2023
      0
    • Erdogan Preserves Western Hegemony and the Zionist Entity

      November 7, 2023
      0
    • 10 Ways to Liberate Palestine

      November 1, 2023
      0
    • War Crimes and the Hypocrisy of Western Powers

      October 27, 2023
      0
    • A Textbook case of Settler Colonialism

      October 27, 2023
      0
    • Dare to Speak: The Double Standards of Politicians

      October 25, 2023
      0
    • The Daily Telegraph on an anti-Palestine frenzy

      October 23, 2023
      0
    • Unveiling the West's firepower for Zionists in the Mediterranean

      October 19, 2023
      0
    • Peterson it is time to take off the blindfold

      October 18, 2023
      0
  • Islamic Culture
    • Virtues of the Month of Muharram

      July 18, 2023
      0
    • The Sublime Day of Arafah and its Merits

      June 26, 2023
      0
    • Merits of the first ten days of Dhul-Hijjah

      June 20, 2023
      0
    • Pragmatic Moon Sighting

      April 17, 2023
      0
    • Rabi ul-Awwal’s Greatest Gift: The Mercy to All Humankind, Muhammad ﷺ

      October 5, 2022
      0
    • Reading Quran

      The story of the man who was told to “Enter Paradise” and ...

      January 24, 2022
      0
    • Significance of Rabi’ul-Awwal

      October 10, 2021
      0
    • The significance of first 10 days of Dhul Hijjah

      July 10, 2021
      0
    • The Honour of the Prophets

      April 30, 2021
      0
  • Da’wah
    • DELEGATIONS IN LONDON VISIT THE MUSLIM DIPLOMATIC MISSIONS TO ACCOUNT THE GOVERNMENTS ...

      November 7, 2023
      0
    • NATIONAL DEMONSTRATION - LIBERATE PALESTINE: YES WE CAN!

      October 15, 2023
      0
    • The UK Muslim Community Statement on the Zionist Occupation

      October 14, 2023
      0
    • Birmingham Conference: Muhammad ﷺ: The Mercy, The Message, The Mission

      July 1, 2023
      0
    • London Conference: Muhammad ﷺ: The Mercy, The Message, The Mission

      July 1, 2023
      0
    • National Conferences: Muhammad ﷺ: The Mercy, The Message, The Mission

      June 12, 2023
      0
    • A Response to the Anti-Hijab Protests in Iran

      September 29, 2022
      0
    • Call to action against Hindutva and Zionist aggression

      July 16, 2022
      0
    • National Conferences : From al-Hind to al-Quds: Speak Out | Act | ...

      June 18, 2022
      0
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Palestine
  • Hindutva
News Watch
Home›News Watch›It’s scary just how much David Cameron doesn’t seem to understand extremism

It’s scary just how much David Cameron doesn’t seem to understand extremism

By News Desk
July 20, 2015
925
0
Share:

Instead of ignoring all the expert advice he’s been given, the Prime Minister should address the political roots of terrorism.

Imagine a Prime Minister, during the height of The Troubles in Northern Ireland, announcing in a speech that he intended to tackle terrorism head on. To do this, he would crack down on the churches which “quietly condone” the IRA, and criminalise opposition to “British values” and the “rule of law” amongst dissidents.

Forget about pursuing a political resolution to the conflict over Northern Ireland, says the PM – this is about ideology and a misplaced sense of “grievance” by the IRA. As part of a raft of new policies, “non-violent extremists” – such as late Ian Paisley perhaps – would be shut out of any political dialogue, since clearly they were a “gateway” to loyalist terrorism, and certainly in no way able to contribute towards a peaceful future.

Such a PM might be condemned as entirely unable to grasp the nature of the conflict in Northern Ireland at the time, and with the benefit of hindsight, we could also say how entirely counter-productive the unnatural focus on religion and ideology was.

Well in 2015, we have a leader who just delivered a speech outlining how it was bad religion, and not politics, that is the cause of political violence. I use the phrase political violence because whether we are talking about Lee Rigby in the United Kingdom, or the Charleston shootings in the United States, or Anders Brevik in Oslo, we are talking about individuals who had political points to make with the lives they took.

Yet in his speech today, Cameron confidently stated that it was ideology that was the major factor in turning people to violence. This is despite the fact hundreds of academics, many who specialise in radicalisation and conflict, signed a public letter criticising the Government’s PREVENT policy’s obsession with the “unsubstantiated view that religious ideology is the primary driving factor for terrorism”. They argued instead that “academic research suggests that social, economic and political factors, as well as social exclusion, play a more central role in driving political violence than ideology.”

In his speech today Cameron also called non-violent extremists a “gateway” to violence. This is despite the fact that in 2010 a Whitehall report specifically argued the opposite, noting that only a handful of violent extremists had ties to non-violent extremist groups – directly in contradiction with Cameron’s own statements today.

Dr Matthew Francis, an academic researching radicalisation, specifically stresses that there is a difference between ideology and violence – “there are radicals that aren’t terrorists, but you also have terrorists who are not radical. It is important to make sure that these concepts are divorced.” This conveyor-belt theory on radicalisation has been discredited at every turn by experts and researchers, and is concerning not least because it casts the net of extremism so wide it undermines some very basic civil liberties.

t’s slightly scary how wrong Cameron is about violent extremism. He’s going against the academic consensus on radicalisation as well as the advice of his own civil servants. Instead, he’s apparently taking advice from Maajid Nawaz – a man whose most notable counter-extremism success is to get Tommy Robinson to leave the English Defence League. Nawaz describes himself as a former extremist, which appears to be his sole claim to expertise in the area of radicalisation. Unlike Nawaz, I’m not an extremist – and I’ve never been one either. I, like many millions of other British Muslims, have never seen the appeal of violence. If Cameron had asked me to advise him on his speech today, my advice would have been pretty straightforward.

Firstly, I’d tell him to address the political roots of terrorism – do this and the appeal of extremist ideology will disappear. For example, maybe it isn’t a great idea to give bombs to Saudi Arabia to deploy across Yemen. I mean, maybe it’s in the desperation and human suffering of nations which are bombed that groups like the Islamic State thrive. The Islamic State was born in post-war Iraq, it grew in the wake of conflict in Syria, and it is expanding in places like Libya. Despite this, Cameron still supports a bombing campaign in Yemen.

I’d probably also suggest Cameron not conflate religious conservatism with violent extremism. The new Liberal Democrat leader, Tim Farron, was criticised for refusing to answer a question on whether homosexuality was a sin. Yet he still clarified his commitment to LGBT rights. He demonstrates it is possible to hold unpopular, even unsavoury, religious views while fully participating in society and civic life. Just because a Muslim believes the leadership of a global Caliph would be valuable to Muslims (for example, to resolve global debates about the dates of Islamic festivals), doesn’t mean he or she is supports the Islamic State.

And finally, I’d suggest he stop linking debates about integration to debates about violent extremism. Tackling forced marriage and female genital mutilation is important. But it has nothing to do with terrorism, and largely cuts across religious groups. Instead of calling on Muslims to ascribe to some imagined list of “British values”, Cameron would do well to recognise that British Muslims are already as British as is possible. Their strengths are Britain’s strengths and their failures are Britain’s failures. By ending the incessant questioning of British Muslims, the rhetoric of violent extremists is undermined.

Perhaps if he listened to any of this, we could then formulate a counter-terrorism policy that worked.

The Independent

Previous Article

Margaret Thatcher’s lobbying of Saudi royals over ...

Next Article

Should the Queen be Referred for Deradicalisation?

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +

Join US on Telegram

Podcast

Latest Posts

Press Releases

O Egypt: Move to Liberate Yourselves and Palestine From Colonial Oppression!

The Muslim Ummah must reject the puppet rulers who serve Western interests, passively watching the genocide that is happening beneath their noses. We must appoint a sincere leader who will ...
  • When Democracy Favours the Capitalists over the Poor

    By Editor
    November 22, 2023
  • Erdogan Preserves Western Hegemony and the Zionist Entity

    By Editor
    November 7, 2023
  • DELEGATIONS IN LONDON VISIT THE MUSLIM DIPLOMATIC MISSIONS TO ACCOUNT THE GOVERNMENTS FOR THEIR INACTION OVER THE OCCUPATION OF PALESTINE

    By Editor
    November 7, 2023
  • RESPONSE TO A MEDIA INQUIRY FROM DOMINIC KENNEDY OF THE TIMES

    By Editor
    November 3, 2023
  • 10 Ways to Liberate Palestine

    By Editor
    November 1, 2023
  • Response from Executive Chairman of Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain to Mail on Sunday Enquiries

    By Editor
    October 28, 2023
  • Gaza Ground Invasion: Urgent Message to the Muslim Community in Britain

    By Editor
    October 28, 2023
  • Press Centre