Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

Top Menu

  • About US
  • Join US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
  • Islamic Culture
  • Da’wah
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
  • About US
  • Join US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

logo

Header Banner

Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
    • Making Sense of Pakistan

      April 16, 2022
      0
    • How Should We View the War in Ukraine?

      March 30, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • DEEP DIVE: The Weaponisation and Politicisation of British Citizenship Laws

      March 12, 2022
      0
    • Our Role in the Ukraine war is to Expose the Propaganda

      March 2, 2022
      0
    • Muslims Should Rejoice Over the Islamic Ruling System

      January 21, 2022
      0
    • Another Warmonger Honoured for Serving the British Elite

      January 2, 2022
      0
    • The Golden Jubilee of Bangladesh Victory Day (Bijoy Dibos): a cause for ...

      December 13, 2021
      0
    • Playing Politics with the Uygher Muslims

      December 2, 2021
      0
  • Islamic Culture
    • Reading Quran

      The story of the man who was told to “Enter Paradise” and ...

      January 24, 2022
      0
    • Significance of Rabi’ul-Awwal

      October 10, 2021
      0
    • Virtues of the Month of Muharram

      August 10, 2021
      0
    • The significance of first 10 days of Dhul Hijjah

      July 10, 2021
      0
    • The Honour of the Prophets

      April 30, 2021
      0
    • A to Z of Ramadan

      April 19, 2021
      0
    • The Dawah to Allah (swt)

      December 29, 2020
      0
    • Miracle of the Quran

      Q & A - Compilation of The Holy Quran During the Reign ...

      December 27, 2020
      0
    • Imam Bukhari: A Role Model for the ‘Ulema and Da’wah Carriers to ...

      November 17, 2020
      0
  • Da’wah
    • Public Demonstration - Independence Not Intervention

      April 22, 2022
      0
    • VIDEO : [LIVESTREAMED] Pakistan in Crisis: The Players, Politics, and People

      April 20, 2022
      0
    • Ramadan Message: The World Needs Islam - We Must Work for the ...

      April 1, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • Ramadhan event: Kyiv to Kabul: The World Needs Islam

      March 20, 2022
      0
    • Obituary of a Dawah Carrier Dr. Youssef Haj Youssef

      December 30, 2021
      0
    • Open Letter to Imams and Muslim Leaders

      September 28, 2021
      0
    • Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain Sends Delegation to Chinese Embassy Condemning the Inhumane Treatment ...

      June 30, 2021
      0
    • Jahangir Raja: Obituary of a Da’wah Carrier

      June 28, 2021
      0
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
Viewpoint
Home›Viewpoint›Democracy… One man, one more broken promise

Democracy… One man, one more broken promise

By Editor
September 26, 2012
1356
0
Share:

“The signs of the hypocrite are three: when he speaks he lies, when he promises he breaks his promise and when he is entrusted he betrays the trust.” (Bukhari and Muslim)

Nick Clegg, deputy Prime Minister of the U.K. and leader of the Liberal Democrat Party announced in a party political broadcast that he was “sorry” for making a pledge to reduce university tuition fees and reneging on that when in office. The excuses he put forward revolved around the assertion that he should not have made a promise he could not keep. He knew the only way they could be in power was in coalition with the Labour or Conservative Party and that considering the economic environment, they could not have kept such a pledge if in power. He went on to say that if the Liberal Democrats were in power alone, he would have kept the promise.  Because he made a promise that he couldn’t keep, he felt he should say “sorry.”

So it was easier to say sorry to the hundreds of thousands of students, their families and millions of Liberal Democrat voters by abandoning his promise and increasing tuition fees than to say sorry to David Cameron, his coalition partner. He was not obliged to break his promise prior to the coalition agreement, even if he had a change of heart. He could of course have stuck to the promise he made to voters and remedied his “error” at the next election.  How quickly the voters were forgotten! They would barely have finished counting the votes before he was negotiating away his mistaken “promise.” Perhaps, as the next general election looms ever closer, Nick feels the need to think about the voters again.

The story received media interest because Clegg claimed his party would end the politics of “broken promises”, making him an easy target. However, in truth he is not the first politician to break a pre-election promise to the electorate. In fact there are no Western Political Parties that have attained power and can claim to have stuck flawlessly to their manifesto? This is not a trend unique to British politics, but one that is replicated across western democracies. Remember George Bush Snr’s “No more taxes!”, or Obama’s promise to close Guantanamo Bay?

The democratic model, whilst claiming to place power in the hands of the people, in fact only succeeds in taking away any meaningful form of power and leaves the poor voter with nothing more than a symbolic box-ticking exercise every few years. The political landscape is dominated by parties, who’s policies are defined by smaller groups of politicians, and enforced through the whip system. These politicians are then courted by interest groups, corporations, media moguls and anyone with the money to buy influence. Everyone has one vote, but some voters carry more weight than others. Thoughts of the people who voted them into power become distant memories, long before the dust has settled on election day.

In a democracy, the real policy decisions are made in this context, under the influence of the powerful and wealthy, all of whom have interests which politicians can help further through their policy decisions. The relationship is symbiotic with the politicians believing their interests, the interests of their party and in some cases even the interests of the country are served by looking after the interests of those with influence. Consideration of the voters is often limited to a headline management exercise and left to back benchers. Front bench politicians do not appear to really care about the electorate except at election time but must normally be seen to be doing the right thing. Anything promised or pledged in a manifesto can be abandoned if it doesn’t seem practical when in power, or if it would conflict too greatly with the interests of influential people the party relies upon in some way, hence eroding the power of the voter to almost nothing.

Two dominant parties with a manifesto they are frequently too willing to break, a back bench that will always tow the party line and an eye to serving the interests of the few in the mistaken belief that it will benefit the many… no wonder the Chief Whip sees us all as “plebs”!

Islamic politics cannot be like that. Lying, breaking promises and peoples trust are signs of hypocrisy (nifaq), the lowest of all actions. Accountability via the courts and the Houses of representatives of the people is paramount and not time limited. The Islamic system empowers the masses to account their leader for what they do and not the rich few.

Becoming the leader of an Islamic system effectively entails the concluding of a contract between the people and that person which is called the “Bayah” (pledge of alleigance). In this pledge, the people agree to obey the governance of this leadership, providing that he abides by an Islamic methodology in his ruling. If he reneges on this, the people have no obligation to abide by his rules and have the right to remove him through the courts or the Majlis al Ummah (House of representatives). This right is for all citizens of the state. In this way there is no ambiguity regarding the origin of authority in the state (the people), the ruling system and the rights of the people to account or remove their leaders when things go wrong.

TagsDemocracy
Previous Article

Hizb ut-Tahrir men protest anti-Islam film

Next Article

UK government admits secret courts would protect ...

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +
  • 0

Related articles More from author

  • Press Releases

    NATO Secures the Western Democracies, but Who will Secure the World from Such Democracy

    December 8, 2019
    By Yahya Nisbet
  • PakistanViewpoint

    Pakistan’s Constitution is Anything but Islamic

    July 13, 2018
    By Editor
  • Viewpoint

    Iraq: What has Democracy Delivered?

    March 7, 2010
    By Editor
  • DemocracyPakistanViewpoint

    Faultline Between Democracy and Shura

    July 17, 2018
    By Editor
  • Press Releases

    Democracy has proved it’s not lesser to dictatorship in fulfilling colonial interests

    October 23, 2008
    By Editor
  • DemocracyViewpoint

    Democracy functions by manipulating people’s feelings

    April 17, 2018
    By Editor

Leave a reply Cancel reply

Liberate Al Aqsa

Join US on Telegram

Podcast

Latest Posts

Press Releases

Protest in London Says No To More Democracy, Yes to the Khilafah

Members of Hizb ut Tahrir in Britain, alongside supporters from the Muslim community, gathered on Saturday 7th May 2022 at the Pakistan High Commission in London to protest against US ...
  • Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain to Protest American Interference in Pakistan’s Politics

    By Yahya Nisbet
    May 1, 2022
  • Public Demonstration – Independence Not Intervention

    By Editor
    April 22, 2022
  • VIDEO : [LIVESTREAMED] Pakistan in Crisis: The Players, Politics, and People

    By Editor
    April 20, 2022
  • The Geopolitics of Badr

    By Editor
    April 17, 2022
  • Making Sense of Pakistan

    By Editor
    April 16, 2022
  • Muslims in Britain Should Speak Out Against the Pakistani Leadership’s Surrender of Kashmir

    By Yahya Nisbet
    April 15, 2022
  • Muslims in Britain should support the call for the Khilafah in Pakistan

    By Yahya Nisbet
    April 12, 2022
  • Press Centre