Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

Top Menu

  • About US
  • Join US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
  • Islamic Culture
  • Da’wah
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
  • About US
  • Join US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

logo

Header Banner

Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
    • Bangladesh Floods: farcical mantra of economic success disguising failure to provide basic ...

      June 24, 2022
      0
    • The Sectarian Card – Shia and Sunni divisions under the spotlight

      June 5, 2022
      0
    • Making Sense of Pakistan

      April 16, 2022
      0
    • How Should We View the War in Ukraine?

      March 30, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • DEEP DIVE: The Weaponisation and Politicisation of British Citizenship Laws

      March 12, 2022
      0
    • Our Role in the Ukraine war is to Expose the Propaganda

      March 2, 2022
      0
    • Muslims Should Rejoice Over the Islamic Ruling System

      January 21, 2022
      0
    • Another Warmonger Honoured for Serving the British Elite

      January 2, 2022
      0
  • Islamic Culture
    • Reading Quran

      The story of the man who was told to “Enter Paradise” and ...

      January 24, 2022
      0
    • Significance of Rabi’ul-Awwal

      October 10, 2021
      0
    • Virtues of the Month of Muharram

      August 10, 2021
      0
    • The significance of first 10 days of Dhul Hijjah

      July 10, 2021
      0
    • The Honour of the Prophets

      April 30, 2021
      0
    • A to Z of Ramadan

      April 19, 2021
      0
    • The Dawah to Allah (swt)

      December 29, 2020
      0
    • Miracle of the Quran

      Q & A - Compilation of The Holy Quran During the Reign ...

      December 27, 2020
      0
    • Imam Bukhari: A Role Model for the ‘Ulema and Da’wah Carriers to ...

      November 17, 2020
      0
  • Da’wah
    • National Conferences : From al-Hind to al-Quds: Speak Out | Act | ...

      June 18, 2022
      0
    • Public Demonstration - Independence Not Intervention

      April 22, 2022
      0
    • VIDEO : [LIVESTREAMED] Pakistan in Crisis: The Players, Politics, and People

      April 20, 2022
      0
    • Ramadan Message: The World Needs Islam - We Must Work for the ...

      April 1, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • Ramadhan event: Kyiv to Kabul: The World Needs Islam

      March 20, 2022
      0
    • Obituary of a Dawah Carrier Dr. Youssef Haj Youssef

      December 30, 2021
      0
    • Open Letter to Imams and Muslim Leaders

      September 28, 2021
      0
    • Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain Sends Delegation to Chinese Embassy Condemning the Inhumane Treatment ...

      June 30, 2021
      0
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
MediaViewpoint
Home›Media›Jamal Harwood comments on the BBC’s “The Ottomans: Europe’s Muslim Emperors”

Jamal Harwood comments on the BBC’s “The Ottomans: Europe’s Muslim Emperors”

By Editor
October 14, 2013
2250
0
Share:

The BBC has rolled out a new three part series covering the 600 years of the Ottoman State with emphasis on its founding, spread, legacy and what it means for the Muslim world today. Having been interviewed for the programme to discuss its Islamic credentials and influences, and having now seen the series and its overtly secular view of the period I am not too disappointed that my interview was cut from the final show. I was however this past week invited to a joint BBC/Islam Channel debate involving the producers of the programme a “Ottoman” specialist academic and a Turkish journalist.

It is laudable that the BBC and others are taking the subject seriously and committing time and resource into presenting a subject which to many represents an ignored period of history. To fill this void requires serious study and reflection. The pros and cons of this rule and its impact upon not only Muslims but also Europe more generally, is now an increasingly important question. The BBC programme adds to this debate in a visually stunning manner. Where Muslims will be disappointed comes from the overtly secular outlook with which Rageh Omar’s commentary is framed. The positives are often put down to tribal, regional or pure militaristic advantages, and the screenwriters are equally happy to attribute the negatives including the state’s decline down to Islam. The second programme very favourably portrays the equanimity and respect afforded to non-Muslims (Jews, Christians and others) within the State, a matter which stands in stark contrast to the oppression of Spanish Catholic inquisition for example, yet the programme makers attribute this tolerance of the Ottomans to a vague notion of “multiculturalism” ignoring the clear Islamic injunctions concerning the fair treatment of non-Muslim citizens of the State. As the Prophet (saw) said: “Whoever harms a Dhimmi (non-Muslim citizen) has harmed me”.

The rules of two Sultans are given greater significance in the second programme. Suleyman the Magnificent (who ruled from 1520 to 1566) is highlighted as al “Kanuni” (the law giver). His reform and consolidation of administrative rules (Canons) within the over-riding authority of the Shariah is somehow heralded to be an early day example of the benefits of “man made” law over “God’s law”. At least according to the BBC. Contrastingly the shift towards Shariah law by Sultan Abdul Hamid the Second (who ruled from 1876 to 1909) in the last years of the state are not put in the context of a state in serious decline (for a number of reasons) but due to the failure of Islam to cure the ills of the State. Muslims will also find it nauseous the way Mustafa Kemal is painted as a saviour of the Turks in the third programme with little reference to the treacherous part the British, French and Russians took in the dismembering of the State and easing his path to rule and in destroying the Caliphate. Kemal’s dramatic secularisation of the nation within a few short years, removing all links to the Arabic language, and as much Islamic culture and practice as possible is summarised as necessary despite its obvious trauma for its peoples not only in Turkey but globally.

It is a real stretch to try and portray the Kemalists (aided by Erdogan’s “Islam very light”) new modern Turkey in any light more favourable then it’s past as the seat of the world’s most influential superpower, a position it maintained over hundreds of years. Its current economic development is exaggerated. Today, despite its abundant resources, manpower and strategic location between East, West and the Middle East, Turkey just manages to scrape into the G20 list of leading economies behind the tiny Netherlands. It is 54 in the global corruption league, suffers under more than $300 billion in state debt and its bi-polar economy fluctuates between high, very high and moderate inflation with an annual trade deficit of $90 billion. Western economists praise it because it is leading the Muslim world into more and more debt and enslaving interest payments. In reality the supposed “sick man” is now the “lonely man” remaining on the periphery of Europe (still black-balled as a member of the EU) and the Middle East – recently soundly rebuffed in Egypt. A strong case can be made for all of Europe to be now labeled as “sick”. Yet because this is the same model the bankers hoist throughout the capitalist world it is held up for great praise. Anyone will look great in the short term after maxing out several credit cards.

This does not mean that Muslims should look back at the Uthmani Caliphate through rose tinted spectacles, or that it was the model state which needs to be emulated today. There were too many excesses by many of the rulers including the misapplication of the bayah to relatives, and the adoption as part of the Tanzimat reforms of secular European laws (while trying to justify them under Islam) was indicative of a state in decline. A decline that was exacerbated when some scholars disapproved of aspects of the industrial revolution and other technological developments as being un-Islamic when they were clearly not, and were sorely needed. The general lack of accounting of rulers which were drifting from implementing Islam also is a great problem, as was the acceptance of division of Muslim lands, apostasy, decline in Arabic (and ijtidad) and so on.

The Uthmani period represents a critical period of Islamic history from which much must be learnt and which ultimately highlights the disastrous implications of losing its leadership and stability when it was disbanded.

Syed Ameer Ali a prominent Indian Politician wrote in the Times of the 5th of March, 1924:

“It is difficult to anticipate the exact effect the abolition of the Caliphate will have on the minds of Muslims of India. But so much I can safely affirm that it will prove to be a disaster to Islam and to civilisation. Suppression of the time honoured institution regarded throughout the Muslim world as a symbol of Islamic unity, will bring the disintegration of Islam as a moral force. It will bring revolution and disorder”.

And how right he sadly was. The destruction of the Khilafah in March of 1924 was a catastrophic calamity for the Ummah and the easy division and colonisation of the Islamic lands was not difficult to foresee as Syed Ameer Ali foretold. The challenge for Muslims today is to understand the vital matter which is the Khilafah system not from a misplaced attachment to history but to the Islamic obligation to live according to the Shariah, with the rules/laws all in accordance with Islam, the security in the hands of Muslims and with one Khaleefah representing all Muslims. As the Prophet (saw) commanded:

“Whosoever dies a death without a bayah to an Imam (Khaleefah) and dies thereon dies the death of jahilliyah (ignorance)” Muslim

Jamal Harwood

TagsJamal Harwood
Previous Article

Syria’s Islamic alliance

Next Article

Thailand Finds 13 Dead Suspected Myanmar Migrants

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +

National Conferences

Join US on Telegram

Podcast

Latest Posts

Viewpoint

Bangladesh Floods: farcical mantra of economic success disguising failure to provide basic protection

Yet another monsoon season has ravaged Bangladesh, with the existing government as ill prepared as ever. More than 4.5 million people have been totally stranded and many killed in perhaps the ...
  • National Conferences : From al-Hind to al-Quds: Speak Out | Act | Liberate

    By Editor
    June 18, 2022
  • The Champions of Free Speech Haven’t a Leg to Stand on

    By Yahya Nisbet
    June 13, 2022
  • Two July Conferences on Indian and Zionist Oppression Organised by Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

    By Yahya Nisbet
    June 10, 2022
  • The Sectarian Card – Shia and Sunni divisions under the spotlight

    By Editor
    June 5, 2022
  • Muslims Must Condemn the Hate Filled Film and the Attempt to Divide Us

    By Yahya Nisbet
    June 5, 2022
  • Protest in London Says No To More Democracy, Yes to the Khilafah

    By Yahya Nisbet
    May 7, 2022
  • Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain to Protest American Interference in Pakistan’s Politics

    By Yahya Nisbet
    May 1, 2022
  • Press Centre