Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

Top Menu

  • About US
  • Join US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
  • Islamic Culture
  • Da’wah
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
  • About US
  • Join US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

logo

Header Banner

Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
    • Making Sense of Pakistan

      April 16, 2022
      0
    • How Should We View the War in Ukraine?

      March 30, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • DEEP DIVE: The Weaponisation and Politicisation of British Citizenship Laws

      March 12, 2022
      0
    • Our Role in the Ukraine war is to Expose the Propaganda

      March 2, 2022
      0
    • Muslims Should Rejoice Over the Islamic Ruling System

      January 21, 2022
      0
    • Another Warmonger Honoured for Serving the British Elite

      January 2, 2022
      0
    • The Golden Jubilee of Bangladesh Victory Day (Bijoy Dibos): a cause for ...

      December 13, 2021
      0
    • Playing Politics with the Uygher Muslims

      December 2, 2021
      0
  • Islamic Culture
    • Reading Quran

      The story of the man who was told to “Enter Paradise” and ...

      January 24, 2022
      0
    • Significance of Rabi’ul-Awwal

      October 10, 2021
      0
    • Virtues of the Month of Muharram

      August 10, 2021
      0
    • The significance of first 10 days of Dhul Hijjah

      July 10, 2021
      0
    • The Honour of the Prophets

      April 30, 2021
      0
    • A to Z of Ramadan

      April 19, 2021
      0
    • The Dawah to Allah (swt)

      December 29, 2020
      0
    • Miracle of the Quran

      Q & A - Compilation of The Holy Quran During the Reign ...

      December 27, 2020
      0
    • Imam Bukhari: A Role Model for the ‘Ulema and Da’wah Carriers to ...

      November 17, 2020
      0
  • Da’wah
    • Public Demonstration - Independence Not Intervention

      April 22, 2022
      0
    • VIDEO : [LIVESTREAMED] Pakistan in Crisis: The Players, Politics, and People

      April 20, 2022
      0
    • Ramadan Message: The World Needs Islam - We Must Work for the ...

      April 1, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • Ramadhan event: Kyiv to Kabul: The World Needs Islam

      March 20, 2022
      0
    • Obituary of a Dawah Carrier Dr. Youssef Haj Youssef

      December 30, 2021
      0
    • Open Letter to Imams and Muslim Leaders

      September 28, 2021
      0
    • Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain Sends Delegation to Chinese Embassy Condemning the Inhumane Treatment ...

      June 30, 2021
      0
    • Jahangir Raja: Obituary of a Da’wah Carrier

      June 28, 2021
      0
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
Viewpoint
Home›Viewpoint›Profits prized over ending fuel poverty

Profits prized over ending fuel poverty

By Editor
October 16, 2011
1770
1
Share:

Paying the rent, putting food on the table or heating the home are the bleak ’choices’ families make each day.

Over 5 million households and rising live in fuel poverty in Britain today. Fuel poverty appears to be a new phenomenon but is another manifestation of the dire effects of financial hardship as increasing numbers of ordinary people find it difficult to make ends meet.

Such a condition has arisen because only the ‘price’ of energy determines who gets what, irrespective of need. Price is the most prominent feature of capitalism and does not distinguish between a person’s need for bare necessities against another’s desires for luxuries.

Banks in the city illuminate spacious empty lobbies at 2 a.m. in the morning because they can afford to but a pensioner in desperate need to keep warm at 2 a.m. in the morning will not turn on his small heater because he does not have the money to pay for the same electricity.

This is the stark human outcome of the privatisation of the utilities in the late 1990s. Dividing up various bits of each utility into production and distribution companies was supposed to increase competition between suppliers, improve service and lower prices. Privatisation was touted as solving the perennial problem of unproductive and inefficient nationalised utilities which had plagued the British industrial landscape.


As with most privatisations the most conspicuous effect has been significantly higher prices for consumers. To illustrate, since privatisation, gas prices have risen by 130% compared to an increase of just over 20% in the 10 years before privatisation (see chart). In comparison, general prices (RPI) have risen by 40-60%. Naturally, fewer and fewer people are now able to afford a decent or even adequate supply of a bare necessity than before privatisation. Meanwhile, the privatised energy companies are making huge profits – up to £125 – per customer according to Ofgem, the government body assigned to regulate the private sector energy companies. It doesn’t take an economist to work out that fuel poverty and huge profits of the energy companies are two sides of the same coin.

The average household bill for heating, cooking and lighting is nearly £1,350 with people in financial hardship paying more because they are forced to pay by metering. The poor are in arrears and increasingly getting in debt unable to pay fuel bills since the government assistance to help placate the public against such blatant injustice is little more than token help in comparison to the profits of the energy companies.

Clearly corporate profits have been prized over people – the hallmark of capitalism.

Islam’s view towards public utilities

The Shariah protects utilities as public properties in Islam belonging to the people in the truest sense of the word unlike nationalised industries whose status depends on the political colour of capitalist governments.

The Messenger of Allah (swt) said: “Muslims  are partners in three: Water, pastures and fire.” Partners means these belong to Muslims as a whole while gas, oil and electricity are from the description of fire since they are fire based fuels. It is not allowed to assign ownership of these including generators and distribution systems to private ownership and they must permanently remain with the public. Profits can therefore never be squeezed out of the people to pay for utilities because these industries belong to the Ummah as a whole not to individuals or companies – who would rightly run their businesses for a profit.

These are of the public properties because without them the Ummah and society would suffer immense hardship. Yet these are not state properties with the Khaleef responsible for the supervision (not ownership) in the best interests of the Ummah.

This ensures that these utilities, which are essentially necessities, are always available to all according to need and not the market which avoids the obscene and unjust situation of fuel poverty under capitalism.

Previous Article

Demonstrations outside Tunisian TV station that aired ...

Next Article

I saw 100 taken to be killed, ...

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +
  • 0

Related articles More from author

  • Viewpoint

    When Buildings Matter More Than Lives

    April 21, 2019
    By Editor
  • Viewpoint

    Problem with gradualism: Egypts military coup highlights the problem with this methodology

    July 7, 2013
    By Editor
  • Viewpoint

    The Insincere Orientalist Approach Towards the Dating of the Quran

    September 7, 2015
    By Editor
  • Viewpoint

    Erdogan – Palestine Was Never a Red Line for You

    December 30, 2020
    By Editor
  • Viewpoint

    Trump, Racism and the Failure of Secular Ideology

    February 11, 2017
    By Editor
  • Viewpoint

    Young’s scorn is not new

    November 20, 2010
    By Editor

1 comment

  1. Muslim 20 October, 2011 at 00:29 Reply

    I used to work for the water utility.

    Clearly, privatization brought in new money
    and upgraded the infrastructure, however, much
    of this is a “false economy”.

    The government should have invested properly
    instead of privatizing a public asset.

    Consider the issue of water pipes.

    New pipes are laid by drilling a small hole in the ground
    and then “feeding” the new pastic pipe through the older
    metal pipe.

    That way the water company causes minimum disruption to
    traffic… for now.

    The problem is that these new plastic pipes are only good
    for about 20 years.

    Question? How come the old pipes lasted much longer?

    Privatization of public assets is a gross injustice
    (especially in the long run).

    Why is it a bad idea to totally privatize the military
    for instance?

    Does anyone listen?
    Not a chance.
    Capitalism just has to “go for the canady”
    and do things in the most myopic way possible.

    bank
    politicians
    utilities

    The whole system is…

Leave a reply Cancel reply

Liberate Al Aqsa

Join US on Telegram

Podcast

Latest Posts

Press Releases

Protest in London Says No To More Democracy, Yes to the Khilafah

Members of Hizb ut Tahrir in Britain, alongside supporters from the Muslim community, gathered on Saturday 7th May 2022 at the Pakistan High Commission in London to protest against US ...
  • Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain to Protest American Interference in Pakistan’s Politics

    By Yahya Nisbet
    May 1, 2022
  • Public Demonstration – Independence Not Intervention

    By Editor
    April 22, 2022
  • VIDEO : [LIVESTREAMED] Pakistan in Crisis: The Players, Politics, and People

    By Editor
    April 20, 2022
  • The Geopolitics of Badr

    By Editor
    April 17, 2022
  • Making Sense of Pakistan

    By Editor
    April 16, 2022
  • Muslims in Britain Should Speak Out Against the Pakistani Leadership’s Surrender of Kashmir

    By Yahya Nisbet
    April 15, 2022
  • Muslims in Britain should support the call for the Khilafah in Pakistan

    By Yahya Nisbet
    April 12, 2022
  • Press Centre