Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

Top Menu

  • About US
  • Join US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
  • Islamic Culture
  • Da’wah
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
  • About US
  • Join US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

logo

Header Banner

Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
    • Making Sense of Pakistan

      April 16, 2022
      0
    • How Should We View the War in Ukraine?

      March 30, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • DEEP DIVE: The Weaponisation and Politicisation of British Citizenship Laws

      March 12, 2022
      0
    • Our Role in the Ukraine war is to Expose the Propaganda

      March 2, 2022
      0
    • Muslims Should Rejoice Over the Islamic Ruling System

      January 21, 2022
      0
    • Another Warmonger Honoured for Serving the British Elite

      January 2, 2022
      0
    • The Golden Jubilee of Bangladesh Victory Day (Bijoy Dibos): a cause for ...

      December 13, 2021
      0
    • Playing Politics with the Uygher Muslims

      December 2, 2021
      0
  • Islamic Culture
    • Reading Quran

      The story of the man who was told to “Enter Paradise” and ...

      January 24, 2022
      0
    • Significance of Rabi’ul-Awwal

      October 10, 2021
      0
    • Virtues of the Month of Muharram

      August 10, 2021
      0
    • The significance of first 10 days of Dhul Hijjah

      July 10, 2021
      0
    • The Honour of the Prophets

      April 30, 2021
      0
    • A to Z of Ramadan

      April 19, 2021
      0
    • The Dawah to Allah (swt)

      December 29, 2020
      0
    • Miracle of the Quran

      Q & A - Compilation of The Holy Quran During the Reign ...

      December 27, 2020
      0
    • Imam Bukhari: A Role Model for the ‘Ulema and Da’wah Carriers to ...

      November 17, 2020
      0
  • Da’wah
    • Public Demonstration - Independence Not Intervention

      April 22, 2022
      0
    • VIDEO : [LIVESTREAMED] Pakistan in Crisis: The Players, Politics, and People

      April 20, 2022
      0
    • Ramadan Message: The World Needs Islam - We Must Work for the ...

      April 1, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • Ramadhan event: Kyiv to Kabul: The World Needs Islam

      March 20, 2022
      0
    • Obituary of a Dawah Carrier Dr. Youssef Haj Youssef

      December 30, 2021
      0
    • Open Letter to Imams and Muslim Leaders

      September 28, 2021
      0
    • Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain Sends Delegation to Chinese Embassy Condemning the Inhumane Treatment ...

      June 30, 2021
      0
    • Jahangir Raja: Obituary of a Da’wah Carrier

      June 28, 2021
      0
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
SyriaViewpoint
Home›Syria›Q&A: Syria Update

Q&A: Syria Update

By Editor
September 3, 2013
1855
0
Share:

Why after two years of conflict is intervention only now being considered?

Despite all the rhetoric by the US and the West, none of them have ever been serious about Basher al-Assad’s removal. Talks between some rebel groups and the West throughout the last 2 years weather Geneva 1 or Geneva 2 have centred on negotiations with the regime and accepting the continuation of the regime in different guises.

In effect these talks have given Basher al-Assad the necessary cover to end the uprising, using whatever tools necessary to achieve this. However al-Assad has lost the North of the country, the South of the country, the countryside and only recently won back the Homs governorate, which it is struggling to hold onto. The rebel groups have seized the East of Damascus from the regime – the countries capital and the seat of the regime. The intervention by Hizbullah only 6 months ago has failed to stem the advance of the rebel groups.

Likely intervention by the West comes as the rebel groups are close to overthrowing the regime.

Is chemical weapons use, really the reason for the imminent intervention?

Chemical weapons use although not a regular feature of the battle for Syria of late was becoming a regular feature. This is because al-Assad, in a desperate attempt to maintain his grip on power, has been forced into this desperate measure, as the rebels advance inside Damascus.

Britain’s dossier on regimes use of Chemical weapons noted their use on 14 different occasions, but not a whimper came from any nation in the West. The independent revealed on September 2nd that Britain itself was exporting Nerve gas to Syria, less then a year ago. Barack Obama’s ‘red line’ on chemical weapons has been more flexible then America’s debt. Therefore to use chemical weapons as a pretext, raises serious question of ‘why now?’

Chemical weapons use should also be put into perspective, whilst the recent chemical attack killed around 1,500 people, over 100,000 have been murdered with conventional weapons through state sieges on towns, indiscriminate air attacks and massacres by state militia. The West has consistently stood by be it weapons of mass destruction or conventional weapons.

All of this shows the motive to intervene now most certainly cannot be the recent chemical weapons attack.

Surely an attack on the al-Assad regime can only be a good thing?

Both the US and the UK have gone to great lengths to explain that any prospective attack on Syria will be limited and will not include regime change. Jay Carney, the White House press secretary told reporters on August 27: “I want to make clear that the options that we are considering are not about regime change. They are about responding to clear violation of an international standard that prohibits the use of chemical weapons.” David Cameron, prime minister of the UK, opened the country’s debate on intervention by making Britain’s aims very clear, he said: “It’s not about taking sides in the conflict, it’s not about invading, it’s not about regime change or indeed working more closely with the opposition. It’s about the large-scale use of chemical weapons and our response to a war crime – nothing else.”

Hence western intervention is not about removing the al-Assad regime. The institute for the study of war in a tactical analysis commented: “US Navy warships are positioned for a strike against Syria using long range Tomahawk Land Attack Missiles (TLAM). Such an attack could cause varying degrees of limited damage to the Assad regime’s ability to use more chemical weapons or continue effective operations against the opposition. It cannot eliminate the regime’s military or chemical weapons capabilities, however, nor cause more than a temporary degradation in regime operations. Such a strike will be ineffective.”

Can the Muslim armies not intervene?

Turkey and Egypt have more than enough military capability to remove the al-Assad regime. However, they have remained mere spectators, refusing to use their armies.

Basher al-Assad has resorted to using the republican guard and the 4th armoured division as the rest of the army is largely Sunni and cannot be trusted. Any Egyptian or Turkish intervention would be facing anything between 20,000 – 80,000 personnel. As Turkey shares a border with Syria it will not have long supply lines and could quickly resupply troops whenever needed. The sheer size of Turkish armed forces would quickly overwhelm al-Assad’s defences.  Turkey makes its own Armoured Personnel Carriers (APC) and tanks, whilst Syria has no indigenous defence industry to speak about. Syria would suffer from huge resupply efforts as it is reliant on foreign supplies to replace destroyed equipment, Turkey’s production facilities can continue to roll out APC’s and tanks if required.

A ground assault combined with an air assault would disable Syria’s SAM batteries – which are surface to air missiles. Turkey has indigenously developed its own unmanned aerial vehicles, which could take out and overwhelm Syria’s missile defence system. Alongside this Turkey has 800 combat aircraft of which 350 are F15 falcon fighting jets Capable of 9g manoeuvres and speeds in excess of Mach 2, these would be no match for al-Assad’s Soviet era MiG’s made in the 1960’s.

A crucial difference between the air combat capability of Syria and Turkey is that Turkey has modern support systems in place for the planes it flies with the result that a high proportion of aircraft are available for operations at any given time.

All this shows that the military capability exists to end the crisis, the political will is however absent.

Who will replace Bashar al-Assad?

For the moment there are three positions on the post-Assad scenario. The US position is as much of the al-Assad regime should remain (including Basher al-Assad if possible) in place with some new faces in the leadership. Leon Panetta as secretary of defence admitted to this in 2012: “I think it’s important when Assad leaves – and he will leave – to try to preserve stability in that country. And the best way to preserve that kind of stability is to maintain as much of the military, the police, as you can, along with the security forces, and hope that they will transition to a democratic form of government. That’s a key.”

The European position on Syria’s future leadership has been for the complete removal of the Ba’athist regime and replacing it with new faces they have been negotiating with. In this endeavour both France and Britain established the ‘Friends of Syria group. This group has spent more time in London and Paris, than fighting in Syria. It established a transitional government and elected Ghassum Hitto as its interim leader, it however has no base in Syria currently.

The Muslims of Syria and the main rebel groups have stated they want no negotiations with the regime and that the groups the west are negotiating with do not represents the people of Syria as they have been in exile for decades. In the second and third weeks of June 2013, Al-Jazeera News aired a series of interviews (in Arabic) with leaders of the main armed groups fighting against Al-Assad’s regime in Syria. They all clearly stated Islam will play a central role after the fall of al-Assad.

What has been the progress of the rebel groups in overthrowing al-Assad?

After 2 years and six months the rebel groups control the north of the country and the al-Assad regime has given up trying to reclaim it. Much of the South is also under rebel control, but intense fighting continues. The centre of the country from the Homs governorate through Damascus to the coast is where the battle continues.

Hizbullah’s entrance into the conflict in the last 6 months and the intervention of Iran ensured the al-Assad regime didn’t collapse. However despite these gains by the regime in Damascus opposition forces have mounted a major offensive, entering many government-held areas and gaining new ground. Much of Eastern Damascus is under rebel control and the battle for South Damascus continues. With fighting taking place in the countries capitol, al-Assad in desperation resorted to his recent chemical attack which was targeted at Ghoutia, which is a Eastern Damascus suburb.

The rebel groups today control more territory than al-Assad, however critical territory remains in regime hands. It is ironic that as the rebels progress in Damascus, talk of western intervention intensifies when al-Assad is on his last legs.

TagsSyria
Previous Article

NYPD labels mosques as ‘terror groups’

Next Article

Rise in cost of dying drives up ...

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +
  • 0

Related articles More from author

  • News Watch

    Police make Syria plea to UK Muslim women

    April 25, 2014
    By Editor
  • SyriaViewpoint

    A Statement from Hizb ut-Tahrir Syria to the Muslim Scholars

    February 12, 2012
    By Editor
  • SyriaViewpoint

    Hizb ut-Tahrir increases pressure on Syrian regime

    February 11, 2012
    By Editor
  • Viewpoint

    Aleppo: A sign of hope

    December 28, 2016
    By Editor
  • SyriaViewpoint

    Why we are marching with the Syrian Uprising

    February 17, 2012
    By Editor
  • SyriaViewpoint

    Who will rescue the Syrian people from Assad’s bloody regime?

    November 24, 2011
    By Editor

Leave a reply Cancel reply

Liberate Al Aqsa

Join US on Telegram

Podcast

Latest Posts

Press Releases

Protest in London Says No To More Democracy, Yes to the Khilafah

Members of Hizb ut Tahrir in Britain, alongside supporters from the Muslim community, gathered on Saturday 7th May 2022 at the Pakistan High Commission in London to protest against US ...
  • Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain to Protest American Interference in Pakistan’s Politics

    By Yahya Nisbet
    May 1, 2022
  • Public Demonstration – Independence Not Intervention

    By Editor
    April 22, 2022
  • VIDEO : [LIVESTREAMED] Pakistan in Crisis: The Players, Politics, and People

    By Editor
    April 20, 2022
  • The Geopolitics of Badr

    By Editor
    April 17, 2022
  • Making Sense of Pakistan

    By Editor
    April 16, 2022
  • Muslims in Britain Should Speak Out Against the Pakistani Leadership’s Surrender of Kashmir

    By Yahya Nisbet
    April 15, 2022
  • Muslims in Britain should support the call for the Khilafah in Pakistan

    By Yahya Nisbet
    April 12, 2022
  • Press Centre