Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

Top Menu

  • About US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
  • Islamic Culture
  • Da’wah
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
  • About US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

logo

Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
    • Abortion isn’t about Roe v Wade but Truth v Hypocrisy

      June 27, 2022
      0
    • Bangladesh Floods: farcical mantra of economic success disguising failure to provide basic ...

      June 24, 2022
      0
    • The Sectarian Card – Shia and Sunni divisions under the spotlight

      June 5, 2022
      0
    • Making Sense of Pakistan

      April 16, 2022
      0
    • How Should We View the War in Ukraine?

      March 30, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • DEEP DIVE: The Weaponisation and Politicisation of British Citizenship Laws

      March 12, 2022
      0
    • Our Role in the Ukraine war is to Expose the Propaganda

      March 2, 2022
      0
    • Muslims Should Rejoice Over the Islamic Ruling System

      January 21, 2022
      0
  • Islamic Culture
    • Reading Quran

      The story of the man who was told to “Enter Paradise” and ...

      January 24, 2022
      0
    • Significance of Rabi’ul-Awwal

      October 10, 2021
      0
    • Virtues of the Month of Muharram

      August 10, 2021
      0
    • The significance of first 10 days of Dhul Hijjah

      July 10, 2021
      0
    • The Honour of the Prophets

      April 30, 2021
      0
    • A to Z of Ramadan

      April 19, 2021
      0
    • The Dawah to Allah (swt)

      December 29, 2020
      0
    • Miracle of the Quran

      Q & A - Compilation of The Holy Quran During the Reign ...

      December 27, 2020
      0
    • Imam Bukhari: A Role Model for the ‘Ulema and Da’wah Carriers to ...

      November 17, 2020
      0
  • Da’wah
    • Call to action against Hindutva and Zionist aggression

      July 16, 2022
      0
    • National Conferences : From al-Hind to al-Quds: Speak Out | Act | ...

      June 18, 2022
      0
    • Public Demonstration - Independence Not Intervention

      April 22, 2022
      0
    • VIDEO : [LIVESTREAMED] Pakistan in Crisis: The Players, Politics, and People

      April 20, 2022
      0
    • Ramadan Message: The World Needs Islam - We Must Work for the ...

      April 1, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • Ramadhan event: Kyiv to Kabul: The World Needs Islam

      March 20, 2022
      0
    • Obituary of a Dawah Carrier Dr. Youssef Haj Youssef

      December 30, 2021
      0
    • Open Letter to Imams and Muslim Leaders

      September 28, 2021
      0
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
Viewpoint
Home›Viewpoint›Rotten Compromise: Secularising Muslims Through Engagement in the UK Political Process

Rotten Compromise: Secularising Muslims Through Engagement in the UK Political Process

By Editor
May 21, 2014
1052
0
Share:

Albert Einstein is credited with the warning “Beware of rotten compromises.” A warning, Muslims calling for political participation should take seriously.

The need for a serious discussion is long overdue, an honest and objective appraisal of the perceived benefits of playing the game of political participation, without covering up the price tag that comes with it.

The Rules of the Game – Acceptance of Secular Values

Jack Straw writing in Prospect in 2002, discussing the need to combat Muslim fundamentalists opined, “Democrats, for example, can never accept that religious injunctions take precedence over temporal laws to do so would threaten the very basis of democratic society. Quite simply this is a central tenet of democratic political practice.”

His argument was to encourage Muslims to engage in the democratic political process as a means to combat those who believed in the ultimate supremacy of Shariah law. Jack Straw understood that engagement in the secular political process is not unregulated; rather it is governed by a number of key secular ideas, which by their very nature contradict the Islamic belief.

The Western world prides itself on these ideas and promotes them wholesale to the world. Britain is no different, enshrining these values into the bloodstream of the country, where it runs through each and every vein of the establishment. The laws and moral values, the entire social fabric of the nation sits on the basis that it is the mind of man that will decide in all matters – God has been relegated, in fact not even a back seat is offered. This decision making is facilitated in the House of Parliament, in which elected members, guided by the capitalist secular values (and big business) decide what is right and wrong, moral and immoral.

To play the game of political participation, the rules of the owner of the bat and ball have to be abided by. Therefore participation requires an explicit acceptance of these very same secular values; applying more so to candidates – but not exclusively to them. The Muslim electorate is by default accepting these yardsticks and criteria, in many cases unwittingly as they aspire to achieve their rights and ‘benefits’.

Compromising The Faith

In order to engage in the political system in the UK, a Muslim is expected to vote for parties with a secular philosophy, then lobby such parties by appealing to those secular philosophies in order to persuade them to provide some benefits to the Muslim community. This inevitably leads to the abandonment of Islamic values, and adopting the western secular framework when judging and arguing for ones rights. Joining such parties necessitates a person to make an explicit confirmation to the constitution, programme, principles and manifesto commitments of the party. These political parties are not neutral platforms but rather adhere to a specific ideology which also forms the foundation of the democratic system.

Muslim MP’s have been promoted to varying degrees over the years, attaining some status within their party of choice. This climb, beyond the rank and file of party membership, comes at a price, a very costly price. These MP’s have to consistently emphasise their commitment to the party’s philosophy and policies irrespective of whether these ideas contradict Islam. The recent appointment of Sajid Javid Conservative MP to the cabinet demonstrates how he had to express his lack of Islamic adherence and his support for the state of Israel. He said the only country in the Middle East where his children would feel the “warm embrace of freedom and liberty” is Israel.1

None of the other Muslim MPs from other parties fair any better. Sadiq Khan shadow Justice Secretary had to express his open support for gay marriages.2 He had also previously voted in support of draconian anti terrorism legislation that has been used unjustly against Muslims.3

Khalid Mahmood Labour MP for Perry Barr spoke out against the alleged Trojan Horse Islamic school takeover plot claiming they were trying to indoctrinate the children with a particular brand of Islam. He had also previously voted for gay rights.4

Baroness Warsi, although not an elected politician, was the first Muslim to serve in a British Cabinet. She openly criticised the Islamic permission related to polygamy.5

The selection processes in these parties filters out sincere Muslim candidates from holding Islamic opinions that contradict the brand of secular values their party expresses. Their loyalty is tested, if they are open advocates of the party’s ideas they will be offered opportunity to become councillors or MPs. While MPs the whipping process further ensures Muslim MPs do not depart from party philosophy and policies.

When Muslims have entered the political process to influence the political parties for the interests of the Muslim community while holding some key Islamic concepts, they are met with hostility. In one such incident it was alleged that IFE (Islamic Forum Europe) were trying to “infiltrate” the Labour Party, in the East London area, with party members who “supported sharia law.” The Labour Party in response to this alleged infiltration stated they would “take firm action and do whatever is necessary to ensure that everyone who joins the party does so as an individual and supports Labour’s aims and values.”6

The Corrupt Bargain – Reframing Islamic Values

Participation in elections is one of the tools used to assimilate Muslims, to dilute their Islamic identity and to make the perceived benefit as the measure for their actions instead of halal or haram. The Islamic concepts and values would be replaced by kufr concepts and values. As time goes by, Muslims would see no problem exposing their awrah, selling prohibited items, accepting homosexuality, condoning occupation of Muslim lands etc.

This is in essence the definition of secularisation, which is the activity of changing something (education, society or morality etc.) so it is no longer under the control or influence of religion. The reframing of the Muslim mindset, means that they no longer consider the Islamic values, but secular values when seeking their interests or as the criteria for their individual actions.

The interests promoted by the secular belief; inherently contradict the Islamic goals/values (maqasid). Whereas secular liberalism celebrates promiscuity, individualism and a hedonistic lifestyle; Islam determines that the preservation of the religion, life, mind, property and family are the key goals for society. The Shariah therefore came to secure these values by adhering to the commands and prohibitions of Allah swt. Thus taking away the sovereignty to man and placing it to the Shariah of Allah swt. Such is the current atmosphere that the commands of Allah (swt) are routinely rubbished and ridiculed. This is the blatant contradiction between the Islamic beliefs and the norms in secular society; norms which are set, enacted and implemented by the democratic political system which Muslims candidate and the electorate are asked to uphold.

Conclusion

It was former US President Jimmy Carter who rightly observed: “Politics is the world’s second oldest profession, closely related to the first.”

It is unfortunate that those Muslims who may have had sincere intentions in engaging in the political process end up changing their Islamic views to the extent they endorse homosexual relationships, occupation of muslim lands and the demonization Islamic values and beliefs. Indeed the democratic political process is a corrupting factor for the Muslim community and does not secure it’s key interests that transcends any personal benefits. These key interests are the development of an Islamic community that holds onto and acts by it’s Islamic beliefs and values while conveying an Islamic call to wider non Muslims society. Anything that compromises the building of an Islamic community in the UK would therefore be seen as antagonistic to the key interests of the Muslim community in the UK.

“You are the best of the nations raised up for mankind; you enjoin what is right and forbid the wrong and believe in Allah; and if the followers of the Book had believed it would have been better for them; of them (some) are believers and most of them are transgressors.” [Quran TMQ 3:110]

1. http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/94117/muslim-tory-mp-after-britain-israel-best

2. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2279703/Death-threats-UKs-Muslim-MP-voted-gay-marriage.html

3. http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2006-03-16&number=196&mpn=Sadiq_Khan&mpc=Tooting&house=commons

4. http://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/11087/khalid_mahmood/birmingham%2C_perry_barr/votes

5. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7900779.stm

6. http://www.asianimage.co.uk/feeds/5034581.print/

 

Previous Article

Muslims and the Politics of Fear

Next Article

“They wish that you would conciliate them, ...

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +

National Conferences

Join US on Telegram

Podcast

Latest Posts

Press Releases

From Al-Hind to Al-Quds – Establish the Khilafah – End the Oppression

Both conferences organised by Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain this weekend were successfully convened in sold out auditoria. The central message and call to action is for Muslims to reject all normalisation ...
  • Call to action against Hindutva and Zionist aggression

    By Editor
    July 16, 2022
  • From Al-Hind to Al-Quds Conference – Speak Out – Act – Liberate

    By Yahya Nisbet
    July 14, 2022
  • Abortion isn’t about Roe v Wade but Truth v Hypocrisy

    By Taji Mustafa
    June 27, 2022
  • Bangladesh Floods: farcical mantra of economic success disguising failure to provide basic protection

    By Editor
    June 24, 2022
  • National Conferences : From al-Hind to al-Quds: Speak Out | Act | Liberate

    By Editor
    June 18, 2022
  • The Champions of Free Speech Haven’t a Leg to Stand on

    By Yahya Nisbet
    June 13, 2022
  • Two July Conferences on Indian and Zionist Oppression Organised by Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

    By Yahya Nisbet
    June 10, 2022
  • Press Centre