Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

Top Menu

  • About US
  • Join US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
  • Islamic Culture
  • Da’wah
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
  • About US
  • Join US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

logo

Header Banner

Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
    • Making Sense of Pakistan

      April 16, 2022
      0
    • How Should We View the War in Ukraine?

      March 30, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • DEEP DIVE: The Weaponisation and Politicisation of British Citizenship Laws

      March 12, 2022
      0
    • Our Role in the Ukraine war is to Expose the Propaganda

      March 2, 2022
      0
    • Muslims Should Rejoice Over the Islamic Ruling System

      January 21, 2022
      0
    • Another Warmonger Honoured for Serving the British Elite

      January 2, 2022
      0
    • The Golden Jubilee of Bangladesh Victory Day (Bijoy Dibos): a cause for ...

      December 13, 2021
      0
    • Playing Politics with the Uygher Muslims

      December 2, 2021
      0
  • Islamic Culture
    • Reading Quran

      The story of the man who was told to “Enter Paradise” and ...

      January 24, 2022
      0
    • Significance of Rabi’ul-Awwal

      October 10, 2021
      0
    • Virtues of the Month of Muharram

      August 10, 2021
      0
    • The significance of first 10 days of Dhul Hijjah

      July 10, 2021
      0
    • The Honour of the Prophets

      April 30, 2021
      0
    • A to Z of Ramadan

      April 19, 2021
      0
    • The Dawah to Allah (swt)

      December 29, 2020
      0
    • Miracle of the Quran

      Q & A - Compilation of The Holy Quran During the Reign ...

      December 27, 2020
      0
    • Imam Bukhari: A Role Model for the ‘Ulema and Da’wah Carriers to ...

      November 17, 2020
      0
  • Da’wah
    • Public Demonstration - Independence Not Intervention

      April 22, 2022
      0
    • VIDEO : [LIVESTREAMED] Pakistan in Crisis: The Players, Politics, and People

      April 20, 2022
      0
    • Ramadan Message: The World Needs Islam - We Must Work for the ...

      April 1, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • Ramadhan event: Kyiv to Kabul: The World Needs Islam

      March 20, 2022
      0
    • Obituary of a Dawah Carrier Dr. Youssef Haj Youssef

      December 30, 2021
      0
    • Open Letter to Imams and Muslim Leaders

      September 28, 2021
      0
    • Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain Sends Delegation to Chinese Embassy Condemning the Inhumane Treatment ...

      June 30, 2021
      0
    • Jahangir Raja: Obituary of a Da’wah Carrier

      June 28, 2021
      0
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
Viewpoint
Home›Viewpoint›Statement on the appointment of William Shawcross as the ‘independent’ reviewer of ‘Prevent’

Statement on the appointment of William Shawcross as the ‘independent’ reviewer of ‘Prevent’

By Editor
February 2, 2021
728
0
Share:

This week saw the long-awaited announcement of the UK government’s so-called ‘independent’ reviewer of the Prevent policy. The previous appointee, Lord Carlile, had to withdraw after he faced criticism for previously advocating for Prevent.

Regarding this appointment and the Prevent policy in general we would make the following points:

1. The appointment Mr Shawcross to lead a review into Prevent is like appointing Harvey Weinstein to lead a review into sexual harassment!

There can be no real ‘independence’ from the government in the sense that he comes from a position that supported the US-led ‘War on Terror’. He was the director of the think tank, the Henry Jackson Society – named after a US Senator famed for his views about the US intervening abroad to spread liberal democracy, and some of whose protegees ended up being the foremost advocates of the ‘War on Terror’ (such as Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Pearle). Shawcross is quoted as saying: “Europe and Islam is one of the greatest, most terrifying problems of our future. I think all European countries have vastly, very quickly growing Islamic populations”.

2. Prevent was not a policy that needed reviewing – it was a dead policy that needed reviving.

The fact the UK government did not find people from an even remotely independent position to review the policy suggests that they feared it may be heavily criticised for its excesses, ineffectiveness and poor evidence base. It is despised in the Muslim community for its oppressive nature. It relies on workers in the health and education sectors policing the thoughts of those they are meant to work with, making significant numbers of people uncomfortable with the policy.

3. Prevent is not about preventing violence, but preventing Islamic views and expression.

In its early days some Muslims believed the rhetoric that Prevent was about identifying people at risk of turning to politically motivated violence. However, many who engaged with it sincerely became increasingly convinced it was about policing thoughts, values and beliefs – specifically targeting the Muslim community. Even though it was later expanded to address right-wing extremism, it disproportionately affected Muslims.

But Prevent is – and always was – a policy targeting Islam. It was part of the global strategy to counter Islamic revival. This was executed globally – through invasion, occupation, control of regimes in the Muslim world and influencing policies and education programmes. At a national level, Prevent worked to demonise any Islamic practices or views that conflicted with dominant liberal norms, by conveying the impression that the more Islamic a person was, the more of a threat they posed – so encouraging Muslims to be less Islamic.

We urge Muslims to be aware of the motives behind this policy, so as to realise that engaging with the policy is supporting a policy aimed to harm Islam and Muslims, not one aimed at preventing violence.

We urge all people who dislike politicians using divisive and authoritarian policies to manipulate public emotions to work for the abolition of Prevent.

We urge all Muslims to realise that the aim of Prevent is to provoke fear that results in self-censorship and abandoning causes that are important to us. It is quite possible that sincere Muslims will convince themselves they are remaining politically active but focus more on political causes that appear less controversial and risky. Or that they convince themselves they can remain faithful to Islamic views, but focus exclusively on the person, not the political.

The function of Prevent and other anti-Islamic policies across the world is to create a distraction from Muslims working to restore Islamic civilisation, under a Khilafah on the method of prophethood, as an alternative to the disastrous situation across the world today. It distracts Muslims, keeping us preoccupied with defending ourselves and Islam from political and ideological attacks. And it distracts the rest of society, focussing them on the potential ‘threat’ from Islam, instead of looking at the harsh reality of the capitalist world they live in today.


See Also

Preventing Islam Report [PDF]

TagsPrevent
Previous Article

America is the New Sick Man

Next Article

Vaccine Nationalism

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +
  • 0

Related articles More from author

  • Press Releases

    Exposing the Plan to Rescue Prevent

    October 23, 2017
    By Yahya Nisbet
  • Infographics

    Infographic: Exposing the Plan to Rescue Prevent

    October 22, 2017
    By Editor
  • Viewpoint

    Open letter about Prevent

    October 23, 2016
    By Abdul Wahid
  • Viewpoint

    Would you appoint Nigel Farage for a Brexit “independent” review?

    August 15, 2019
    By Abdul Wahid
  • Videos

    The commission for countering Islam

    February 6, 2018
    By Editor
  • Press Releases

    MP’s expose Prevent: About changing Islam, not dealing with causes of Muslim anger

    March 30, 2010
    By Editor

Liberate Al Aqsa

Join US on Telegram

Podcast

Latest Posts

Press Releases

Protest in London Says No To More Democracy, Yes to the Khilafah

Members of Hizb ut Tahrir in Britain, alongside supporters from the Muslim community, gathered on Saturday 7th May 2022 at the Pakistan High Commission in London to protest against US ...
  • Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain to Protest American Interference in Pakistan’s Politics

    By Yahya Nisbet
    May 1, 2022
  • Public Demonstration – Independence Not Intervention

    By Editor
    April 22, 2022
  • VIDEO : [LIVESTREAMED] Pakistan in Crisis: The Players, Politics, and People

    By Editor
    April 20, 2022
  • The Geopolitics of Badr

    By Editor
    April 17, 2022
  • Making Sense of Pakistan

    By Editor
    April 16, 2022
  • Muslims in Britain Should Speak Out Against the Pakistani Leadership’s Surrender of Kashmir

    By Yahya Nisbet
    April 15, 2022
  • Muslims in Britain should support the call for the Khilafah in Pakistan

    By Yahya Nisbet
    April 12, 2022
  • Press Centre