Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

Top Menu

  • About US
  • Join US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
  • Islamic Culture
  • Da’wah
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
  • About US
  • Join US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

logo

Header Banner

Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
    • Making Sense of Pakistan

      April 16, 2022
      0
    • How Should We View the War in Ukraine?

      March 30, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • DEEP DIVE: The Weaponisation and Politicisation of British Citizenship Laws

      March 12, 2022
      0
    • Our Role in the Ukraine war is to Expose the Propaganda

      March 2, 2022
      0
    • Muslims Should Rejoice Over the Islamic Ruling System

      January 21, 2022
      0
    • Another Warmonger Honoured for Serving the British Elite

      January 2, 2022
      0
    • The Golden Jubilee of Bangladesh Victory Day (Bijoy Dibos): a cause for ...

      December 13, 2021
      0
    • Playing Politics with the Uygher Muslims

      December 2, 2021
      0
  • Islamic Culture
    • Reading Quran

      The story of the man who was told to “Enter Paradise” and ...

      January 24, 2022
      0
    • Significance of Rabi’ul-Awwal

      October 10, 2021
      0
    • Virtues of the Month of Muharram

      August 10, 2021
      0
    • The significance of first 10 days of Dhul Hijjah

      July 10, 2021
      0
    • The Honour of the Prophets

      April 30, 2021
      0
    • A to Z of Ramadan

      April 19, 2021
      0
    • The Dawah to Allah (swt)

      December 29, 2020
      0
    • Miracle of the Quran

      Q & A - Compilation of The Holy Quran During the Reign ...

      December 27, 2020
      0
    • Imam Bukhari: A Role Model for the ‘Ulema and Da’wah Carriers to ...

      November 17, 2020
      0
  • Da’wah
    • Public Demonstration - Independence Not Intervention

      April 22, 2022
      0
    • VIDEO : [LIVESTREAMED] Pakistan in Crisis: The Players, Politics, and People

      April 20, 2022
      0
    • Ramadan Message: The World Needs Islam - We Must Work for the ...

      April 1, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • Ramadhan event: Kyiv to Kabul: The World Needs Islam

      March 20, 2022
      0
    • Obituary of a Dawah Carrier Dr. Youssef Haj Youssef

      December 30, 2021
      0
    • Open Letter to Imams and Muslim Leaders

      September 28, 2021
      0
    • Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain Sends Delegation to Chinese Embassy Condemning the Inhumane Treatment ...

      June 30, 2021
      0
    • Jahangir Raja: Obituary of a Da’wah Carrier

      June 28, 2021
      0
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
SyriaViewpoint
Home›Syria›The American Foreign Policy Game in Syria

The American Foreign Policy Game in Syria

By Editor
September 23, 2013
1490
0
Share:

US President Obama stated that the United States, after the chemical attack in the suburbs of Damascus, has an obligation to act ‘as a leader in the world.’[1] Secretary of State, John Kerry took this a step further when he said ‘….history would judge us all extraordinarily harshly if we turned a blind eye to a dictator’s wanton use of weapons of mass destruction against all warnings, against all common understanding of decency.”[2] In beginning this article, one would find the word ‘game’ a fitting term to use in justifying American foreign policy and examples to come will give some insight as to why. The United States, its statesman and foreign policy machine, having attempted to justify the impending strike in Syria with morality and justification based upon leadership of the so called ‘civilised world.’ This can’t help but leave the observer  pondering upon the past given the lofty nature of the statements above.

US President Obama stated in mid-2012 that the use of chemical weapons was a ‘Red-line’ for the United States, the astute observer would no doubt have rung the hypocrisy bell.[3] After all, in late 2004 , when the United States used incendiary white phosphorus against Iraqi civilians, there was ever any talk of an attack on so much as a American toy tank? When the Israeli IDF launched white Phosphorus shells into Gaza in 2009, the world stood silent and no word was conceived or spoken of in relation to punishing the Israeli militarily for its use of what is most certainly a chemical weapon. Whilst John Kerry decries the deaths of an estimated 1429 of the Syrian people in a single incident, it is further worth noting that is a mere fraction of the number that have died as a result of the tyrannical Assad family dynasty.[4] Yet during this time the US has not concerned itself seriously on the military and diplomatic front with the deaths of men, women and children. Rather it has at every point looked to fulfil its interests, which continue to be paid for with the blood of the innocent inside Syria. Ironically, though unsurprisingly, there is congruence between the actions of the United States and the brutal Bashar al Assad. Can one really conclude that the deaths of the Syrian people, or indeed the use of chemical weapons, which have been used before in this conflict in Khan al Assal and other areas, is what is really driving US foreign policy? Or is this all a convenient excuse to justify the real goal or objective. As an additional point, the Syrian regime has possessed mustard gas and sarin for some years and as to how and from where these agents were acquired by the Syrian government, there are some ironic observations, however that it is not the subject of this article.

So why then is a seemingly imminent US strike, with GPS guided tomahawk cruise missiles upon targets in Syria, on the cards? Why does this military strike make up part of the game? Some would have us believe that US credibility is at stake and that Obama has dug himself a diplomatic ditch that he can only hope to shoot himself out of due to past statements about ‘red-lines.’ Others, would say that an attack on the strategic army headquarter bases in Damascus, particularly in Mezzeh and the Qasyoun, along with Syria’s defence systems and  those particular divisions that orchestrated  the chemical attack in the Damascene suburbs would send a clear message to the Baa’th regime that military escalations of this sort are indeed a ‘red-line.’ Something easier upon imagining, is that the US could well want to attack the regime and at the same time target elements of the opposition to Bashar’s regime that are deemed to be ‘Islamist’ and dangerous to US interests in the inevitable post-Assad Syria. Indeed, the rebel elements in Daraya, Moudamiya and other Damascus suburbs would make prime targets.

Whilst, some of these views are more credible than others, the fundamental point is being missed in the discussion thus far, and that is that the Syrian Revolution has proven itself to be the ‘wild-child’ of the Arab Spring. It has proven to be utterly unpredictable and against the interests of indeed all international powers on all ends of the spectrum, from the United States to Russia and everything in between. Furthermore, the lack of control that outside powers have on those on the ground is striking and what is worse for the west is that those on the street and in the frontlines are espousing overtly Islamic sentiments towards an Islamic Syria, governed by the Shariah of their God. Indeed, whilst some may claim this is a Qatari or Saudi or even Turkish inspired conspiracy, the reality is that what is playing out in Syria is Islamic and overtly at that. Given this nightmare reality for the Americans and the lack of credible alternatives capable of joining the military and political dots on the ground via the alliance of Salim Idris (FSA) and Ahmad al Jarba (SNC),  American policy is left with few options.

The game of American foreign policy is thus to continue to allow the murderous blood thirsty and flesh hungry regime to continue it’s deadly rampage destroying Syria until all that remains is sharp jagged broken rock and mortar shell remains for the new emerged Islamic State to build on, should it arise at the hands of those raising its flag and calling daily for its emergence. From this view, further damage to the infrastructure within Syria via so called ‘targeted strikes’ will only continue to aid in this pursuit. It will weaken Syria further militarily and economically, to the point where it will be paralysed. It must furthermore be remembered that the goal of this anticipated operation is not to inspire regime change and thus the question of replacing Assad is still not an option owing to a lack of US backed support on the ground.[5] Ultimately, The United States and Russia are in absolute agreement on the aims of the so called ‘Geneva II’ conference/ initiative which ultimately seeks to bring about a negotiated settlement between the western backed opposition and the Syrian government. The hope of the American foreign policy machine is thus to abort the aim of Islamic political change thus securing its own interests. Russia also has an interest in securing its interests in Syria while never allowing for Islamic political change to occur, as it has demonstrated in Chechnya and Dagestan.

The American foreign policy game in Syria is one that has fundamentally etched into his very being the interests of the red, white and blue above any concern for human dignity, life or concern for any semblance of morality. The Muslim World has been dominated over and controlled for tens of years and its affairs discussed in London, Paris and Washington, instead of Damascus, Cairo and Islamabad. The time has surely now come for the Muslim World to seek true independence from the colonial exploitation it finds itself in and seek its rightful place as a Superpower in its own right, under the sovereignty of the one idea it can unanimously accept as having the right to govern the affairs of life in all its various spheres. Ultimately success lies in unity across borders, unity across strands of thought and political unity exemplified in, that which gave Muslims a shield from the Crusaders of yester –century, the Islamic Khilafah. Other than this, we will continue to see the disasters of yesterday (Afghanistan and Iraq) become the disasters of today and the seemingly impending strike on Syria is another reminder of exactly this.

 


[1] The Telegraph : http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/barackobama/10277599/Syria-Barack-Obama-says-US-has-obligation-as-world-leader-to-act.html

[2] New York Times : http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/31/world/middleeast/john-kerry-syria.html

 [3] Washington Post : http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/obama-issues-syria-red-line-warning-on-chemical-weapons/2012/08/20/ba5d26ec-eaf7-11e1-b811-09036bcb182b_story.html

 [4] BBC News: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-23906913

 [5] Xinhua: http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/world/2013-08/28/c_132668349.htm

 

TagsSyria
Previous Article

Public Meeting: Syria’s Islamic Revolution and Egypt’s ...

Next Article

Muslim Brotherhood banned by Egyptian court

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +
  • 0

Related articles More from author

  • SyriaViewpoint

    After kneeling to appease the US, the Syrian Coalition totally submits, bowing to the feet of Ford.

    November 18, 2013
    By Editor
  • SyriaViewpoint

    Video Trailer – March to support the uprising in Syria

    February 11, 2012
    By Editor
  • Videos

    Syria conflict: How do I make sense of the confusion?

    February 11, 2016
    By Taji Mustafa
  • Syria

    Syria – 7 Years On

    April 3, 2018
    By Editor
  • News Watch

    ‘Yarmouk is being annihilated’: Palestinians in Syria are left to their fate

    May 2, 2015
    By Editor
  • Khutbahs

    Have we abandoned Aleppo?

    October 29, 2016
    By Taji Mustafa

Leave a reply Cancel reply

Liberate Al Aqsa

Join US on Telegram

Podcast

Latest Posts

Press Releases

Protest in London Says No To More Democracy, Yes to the Khilafah

Members of Hizb ut Tahrir in Britain, alongside supporters from the Muslim community, gathered on Saturday 7th May 2022 at the Pakistan High Commission in London to protest against US ...
  • Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain to Protest American Interference in Pakistan’s Politics

    By Yahya Nisbet
    May 1, 2022
  • Public Demonstration – Independence Not Intervention

    By Editor
    April 22, 2022
  • VIDEO : [LIVESTREAMED] Pakistan in Crisis: The Players, Politics, and People

    By Editor
    April 20, 2022
  • The Geopolitics of Badr

    By Editor
    April 17, 2022
  • Making Sense of Pakistan

    By Editor
    April 16, 2022
  • Muslims in Britain Should Speak Out Against the Pakistani Leadership’s Surrender of Kashmir

    By Yahya Nisbet
    April 15, 2022
  • Muslims in Britain should support the call for the Khilafah in Pakistan

    By Yahya Nisbet
    April 12, 2022
  • Press Centre