Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

Top Menu

  • About US
  • Join US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
  • Islamic Culture
  • Da’wah
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
  • About US
  • Join US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

logo

Header Banner

Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
    • Bangladesh Floods: farcical mantra of economic success disguising failure to provide basic ...

      June 24, 2022
      0
    • The Sectarian Card – Shia and Sunni divisions under the spotlight

      June 5, 2022
      0
    • Making Sense of Pakistan

      April 16, 2022
      0
    • How Should We View the War in Ukraine?

      March 30, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • DEEP DIVE: The Weaponisation and Politicisation of British Citizenship Laws

      March 12, 2022
      0
    • Our Role in the Ukraine war is to Expose the Propaganda

      March 2, 2022
      0
    • Muslims Should Rejoice Over the Islamic Ruling System

      January 21, 2022
      0
    • Another Warmonger Honoured for Serving the British Elite

      January 2, 2022
      0
  • Islamic Culture
    • Reading Quran

      The story of the man who was told to “Enter Paradise” and ...

      January 24, 2022
      0
    • Significance of Rabi’ul-Awwal

      October 10, 2021
      0
    • Virtues of the Month of Muharram

      August 10, 2021
      0
    • The significance of first 10 days of Dhul Hijjah

      July 10, 2021
      0
    • The Honour of the Prophets

      April 30, 2021
      0
    • A to Z of Ramadan

      April 19, 2021
      0
    • The Dawah to Allah (swt)

      December 29, 2020
      0
    • Miracle of the Quran

      Q & A - Compilation of The Holy Quran During the Reign ...

      December 27, 2020
      0
    • Imam Bukhari: A Role Model for the ‘Ulema and Da’wah Carriers to ...

      November 17, 2020
      0
  • Da’wah
    • National Conferences : From al-Hind to al-Quds: Speak Out | Act | ...

      June 18, 2022
      0
    • Public Demonstration - Independence Not Intervention

      April 22, 2022
      0
    • VIDEO : [LIVESTREAMED] Pakistan in Crisis: The Players, Politics, and People

      April 20, 2022
      0
    • Ramadan Message: The World Needs Islam - We Must Work for the ...

      April 1, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • Ramadhan event: Kyiv to Kabul: The World Needs Islam

      March 20, 2022
      0
    • Obituary of a Dawah Carrier Dr. Youssef Haj Youssef

      December 30, 2021
      0
    • Open Letter to Imams and Muslim Leaders

      September 28, 2021
      0
    • Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain Sends Delegation to Chinese Embassy Condemning the Inhumane Treatment ...

      June 30, 2021
      0
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
Viewpoint
Home›Viewpoint›The Arab Spring and the red lines of Islamic governance

The Arab Spring and the red lines of Islamic governance

By Editor
January 24, 2012
1017
0
Share:

As political Islam emerges from the ruins of dictators, what are Islam’s non-negotiable ‘red lines’ of governance.

If 2011 was the year of uprising, excitement and radical change in the Middle East then 2012 may well be the year of celebration, consolidation and the Ummah taking control of her destiny. For the vacuum left by the departing dictators must now be filled, and vying for the position are a variety of candidates ranging from ‘secularist’ to so-called ‘islamists’. As most of the candidates will inevitably claim to represent Islam in some form or another, it is important to be able to accurately determine Islam’s non-negotiable ‘red lines’ in order to ensure the uprisings – from Tunisia to Egypt – are not dragged away from an Islamic awakening.

The following key points therefore serve as important criteria to judge all candidates claiming to represent Islam:

Sovereignty is not in the hands of people, but for the Shari’ah alone
A common truism in the west is that power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. This is true whether that power is held by one individual or a group. For anyone to hold the right to legislate will always and inevitably lead to oppression and corruption, which characterise both dictatorships and democracies in the world today. This is because those holding power are certainly going to be influenced, either by those seeking to bend the system in their favour, by their own experiences which will always be limited and biased, or by public opinion which is by its nature erratic and shallow.

Islam recognises this innate weakness in people and removes the power to legislate entirely from the hands of Man, thus ensuring that no matter who is in charge the system is insulated from becoming institutionally corrupt.

إِنِ الْحُكْمُ إِلَّا لِلَّه

“The rule is for none but Allah” (An-Anam:56)

 The Islamic constitution, unlike the constitution of a Democratic state, is derived from fixed sources. The relationship between ruler and ruled are clearly delineated, as is the remit of the rulers authority and the process by which he can be accounted by his people. This transparency is alien to the western democratic model where rulers can raise taxes, cut services and even wage war and the people have little or no power to prevent them. Under an Islamic system, people are fully aware of the origins of the law, and that it cannot be changed at a whim. The system cannot be distorted or corrupted by powerful individuals, as is the norm under the Democratic model where political lobbying is an institutionalised and legitimate part of the system.

Authority to elect a ruler is for the people alone
Much is made of the openness of politics in western democracy, but the truth is it is an incredibly closed and elitist system. Whilst people are made to feel as though they are in control, in reality their ability to choose their leaders are limited to say the least. The process is dominated by political parties, who are funded by wealthy corporations, groups and individuals in exchange for favourable policies. This system ensures that the voice of the average person will never have any true representation. ‘Power to the people’ in truth is no more than ‘the illusion of power to the people’.

Islam establishes the people’s right to choose as founding principle. No one can monopolise the process to leave people disenfranchised, nor can a ruler be forced upon the people against their will.

A ruler (Khalifah) is therefore elected through popular mandate, a legally binding contract between him and the people to rule and be ruled by the established law and constitution of Islam. Should he step outside the remit of this contract, his removal becomes possible.

“Whoever takes off his hand from an obedience, he will meet Allah on the Resurrection Day without having any proof to show for himself; and whoever dies while having no Bay’ah on his neck he dies the death of the days of ignorance (jahiliyyah) [Narrated by Muslim]

The Khalifah is not a King or dictator who imposes his authority on the people through coercion or force, his right to rule must be given willingly by the Muslims. Nor is he like the President or Prime Minister of a democratic state who is like the puppet in the hands of the powerful elite, changing legislation to suit their interests. A key condition of his candidacy is that he is not unduly influenced or controlled by any outside force.

Unity of the Ummah

Islam calls for the reunification of the Muslim lands. In recent history the the world is shifted away from the nation state towards globalisation which has interlinked the world. In Europe the European Union was an attempt to integrate the continent. The Khilafah state does not recognise the nation states that exist today in the Muslim territories and throughout the world. Islam rejects all notions of nationalism, which is alien to Islam yet a central factor in the development of Western nations. Islam forbids having more than one ruler and thus more than one Islamic state.

Abu Sa’id Al-Khudri reported from the Messenger of Allah (swt) that he said:

“When an oath of Bay’ah has been taken for two Khulafaa’, kill the latter of them. [Narrated by Muslim]

Previous Article

Ahl udh-Dhimma and the Right of Guardianship ...

Next Article

19,000 military men and women were sexually ...

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +

National Conferences

Join US on Telegram

Podcast

Latest Posts

Viewpoint

Bangladesh Floods: farcical mantra of economic success disguising failure to provide basic protection

Yet another monsoon season has ravaged Bangladesh, with the existing government as ill prepared as ever. More than 4.5 million people have been totally stranded and many killed in perhaps the ...
  • National Conferences : From al-Hind to al-Quds: Speak Out | Act | Liberate

    By Editor
    June 18, 2022
  • The Champions of Free Speech Haven’t a Leg to Stand on

    By Yahya Nisbet
    June 13, 2022
  • Two July Conferences on Indian and Zionist Oppression Organised by Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

    By Yahya Nisbet
    June 10, 2022
  • The Sectarian Card – Shia and Sunni divisions under the spotlight

    By Editor
    June 5, 2022
  • Muslims Must Condemn the Hate Filled Film and the Attempt to Divide Us

    By Yahya Nisbet
    June 5, 2022
  • Protest in London Says No To More Democracy, Yes to the Khilafah

    By Yahya Nisbet
    May 7, 2022
  • Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain to Protest American Interference in Pakistan’s Politics

    By Yahya Nisbet
    May 1, 2022
  • Press Centre