Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

Top Menu

  • About US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
  • Islamic Culture
  • Da’wah
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
  • About US
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Comment
  • Question and Answer
  • Watch us Live

logo

Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

  • Home
  • Viewpoint
    • Abortion isn’t about Roe v Wade but Truth v Hypocrisy

      June 27, 2022
      0
    • Bangladesh Floods: farcical mantra of economic success disguising failure to provide basic ...

      June 24, 2022
      0
    • The Sectarian Card – Shia and Sunni divisions under the spotlight

      June 5, 2022
      0
    • Making Sense of Pakistan

      April 16, 2022
      0
    • How Should We View the War in Ukraine?

      March 30, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • DEEP DIVE: The Weaponisation and Politicisation of British Citizenship Laws

      March 12, 2022
      0
    • Our Role in the Ukraine war is to Expose the Propaganda

      March 2, 2022
      0
    • Muslims Should Rejoice Over the Islamic Ruling System

      January 21, 2022
      0
  • Islamic Culture
    • Reading Quran

      The story of the man who was told to “Enter Paradise” and ...

      January 24, 2022
      0
    • Significance of Rabi’ul-Awwal

      October 10, 2021
      0
    • Virtues of the Month of Muharram

      August 10, 2021
      0
    • The significance of first 10 days of Dhul Hijjah

      July 10, 2021
      0
    • The Honour of the Prophets

      April 30, 2021
      0
    • A to Z of Ramadan

      April 19, 2021
      0
    • The Dawah to Allah (swt)

      December 29, 2020
      0
    • Miracle of the Quran

      Q & A - Compilation of The Holy Quran During the Reign ...

      December 27, 2020
      0
    • Imam Bukhari: A Role Model for the ‘Ulema and Da’wah Carriers to ...

      November 17, 2020
      0
  • Da’wah
    • Call to action against Hindutva and Zionist aggression

      July 16, 2022
      0
    • National Conferences : From al-Hind to al-Quds: Speak Out | Act | ...

      June 18, 2022
      0
    • Public Demonstration - Independence Not Intervention

      April 22, 2022
      0
    • VIDEO : [LIVESTREAMED] Pakistan in Crisis: The Players, Politics, and People

      April 20, 2022
      0
    • Ramadan Message: The World Needs Islam - We Must Work for the ...

      April 1, 2022
      0
    • The India Hijab Issue from an Islamic Perspective

      March 24, 2022
      0
    • Ramadhan event: Kyiv to Kabul: The World Needs Islam

      March 20, 2022
      0
    • Obituary of a Dawah Carrier Dr. Youssef Haj Youssef

      December 30, 2021
      0
    • Open Letter to Imams and Muslim Leaders

      September 28, 2021
      0
  • Media
  • People
    • Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabahani (Founder)
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zallum (Successor)
    • Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta (Ameer)
    • Abdul Wahid
    • Abu Yusuf
    • Jamal Harwood
    • Taji Mustafa
  • Books
  • Youth
  • Covid-19
Viewpoint
Home›Viewpoint›Unmasking the Differing Approaches to COVID-19

Unmasking the Differing Approaches to COVID-19

By Editor
March 29, 2020
2702
0
Share:

Four footballers have been placed on suicide watch as the coronavirus crisis continues to wreak havoc across the world. With many nations in lockdown, there are fears that many people’s mental health may suffer as a result of the financial insecurity and lack of structure that the COVID-19 outbreak has caused.

There are three broad strategies that have emerged in how countries have dealt with the COVID-19 outbreak.

First is the herd immunity approach. Let the disease burn through the population while attempting to protect the vulnerable from increased risk of exposure.

Second is the lockdown method. Severely restrict people’s movements and attempt to confine people in their homes and thus starve the normal interactions that would allow the virus to spread within the society.

Third is wide testing of all suspected cases and then isolate and contact-trace all those infected and those whom they could have infected. The basic idea is to identify anyone with potential COVID-19 symptoms, even mild ones. Test them to confirm the infection and then trace all their possible contacts. Isolate those contacts and test to see if they have the infection.

All three strategies have some rationale as well as trade-offs. The herd immunity approach may well help build immunity in the long term and allow societies to continue to function (at least in the short term) but it poses a significant risk to vulnerable members of the society. It could easily lead to mass infections and hospitalisations that lead to overwhelming the health services and thus greater mortality rates.

As for the complete lockdown method, this has massive implications on the economy and therefore the lives of everyone within society. It can be effective, if we believe the figures coming out of China, but needs to be implemented very early on and has to be total in its application. However, the long-term impact on people’s lives can be quite devastating. Loss of income, businesses and potential devastation to people’s lives (even some unintended deaths).

As for the third method which has been implemented in places such as South Korea, Singapore and Japan: it has allowed normal day to day businesses and lives to continue for the vast majority of healthy people within society. Schools remain open, restaurants, shops and even places of worship. It’s been shown to have dramatically slowed the infection rates and even reversed them in some countries. It allows greater targeting of care for the vulnerable and thus better medical treatment and outcomes (and lower mortality rates).

The main prerequisite for this approach is that it requires good societal infrastructure. Countries like Singapore and South Korea developed these strategies due to their experiences with SARS and even MERS. It meant they were able to act fast, locate people who even shared taxi journeys with infected drivers as well as people who were at the same restaurants with them who ate there.

These nations used mobile phone data to track individuals, ATM usage, CCTV and general announcements for residents to check for themselves. Together with wide testing they quickly located and isolated suspected cases and thus prevented any further infections or significantly slowed it down while not impacting wider society. Current evidence, therefore, shows that the best way to deal with an outbreak like this is the third strategy.

As such from an Islamic perspective you would not need to close down mosques or jummah salah while being extremely effective in stopping any further spread. But this would require an effective system of governance and leadership that’s competent – has strategies and processes already put into place and the ability to properly enforce this in society for the good of the people.

The lockdown approach in places such as Iran, Pakistan and the Arab countries will cause much-unintended harm as many people live from day-to-day and this approach is unsustainable for the long term with many people likely to lose their lives due to their inability to fulfil their basic needs and access essential services.

Here lies the problem in the Muslim world. There’s no leadership, there’s no effective system in place, there’s no rule of law for all, there are no binding values that unify the people behind their leadership such that they trust and follow them. There’s little to no investment in healthcare infrastructure. Rulers rule to achieve their interests, they monitor individuals only to spy on them so as to silence or prevent any threat against their leadership.

What we then see is rulers in the Muslim world simply copying the stance of the West. When the west ran out of strategies to contain the virus, they simply went into lockdown and thus the Muslims lacking any insight, leadership or independent thinking, simply followed like sheep what was being done in the West.

Effective strategies come through proper effective leadership built on a clear viewpoint on life, i.e. Islam. Without this, you’ll just have sheep-like following of the West while having little real concern for citizens and inability to develop innovative, creative ways to deal with problems like the coronavirus.

That is where the need for an intellectual revival is required to think in creative ways built upon Islamic values. This creativity though needs a mechanism to bring it about and that’s where we need real Islamic leadership i.e. the Khilafah state. Hence, in the past the Muslims with their Islamic state were able to innovate new solutions to problems: calculations of taxes and inheritance laws through developing algebra, or the compilation of the Quran at the initiation of Khalifah Abu Bakr (ra) as well as numerous other examples where Muslims innovated and created means to look after people’s affairs. This innovation was inspired and directed by the belief in Islam and that’s something we need to return back to.

TagsCoronavirusCovid-19
Previous Article

[Infographic] Covid19 – The Muslim Perspective

Next Article

Covid-19: Is This the End of Liberalism

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +

National Conferences

Join US on Telegram

Podcast

Latest Posts

Press Releases

From Al-Hind to Al-Quds – Establish the Khilafah – End the Oppression

Both conferences organised by Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain this weekend were successfully convened in sold out auditoria. The central message and call to action is for Muslims to reject all normalisation ...
  • Call to action against Hindutva and Zionist aggression

    By Editor
    July 16, 2022
  • From Al-Hind to Al-Quds Conference – Speak Out – Act – Liberate

    By Yahya Nisbet
    July 14, 2022
  • Abortion isn’t about Roe v Wade but Truth v Hypocrisy

    By Taji Mustafa
    June 27, 2022
  • Bangladesh Floods: farcical mantra of economic success disguising failure to provide basic protection

    By Editor
    June 24, 2022
  • National Conferences : From al-Hind to al-Quds: Speak Out | Act | Liberate

    By Editor
    June 18, 2022
  • The Champions of Free Speech Haven’t a Leg to Stand on

    By Yahya Nisbet
    June 13, 2022
  • Two July Conferences on Indian and Zionist Oppression Organised by Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain

    By Yahya Nisbet
    June 10, 2022
  • Press Centre